cblas-cblas-reference-20030223-r2 fails to install, because of the cblas-reference-20030223-autotool.patch. A new patch folows, which corrects for the failure and will also install the include file cblas.h, needed for many uses of cblas. At least blas-atlas installs a cblas.h, and maybe mkl. Should eselect-cblas also select the proper include file?
Created attachment 99297 [details, diff] cblas-reference-20030223-autotool.patch New patch for autotools.
Great, thanks! Whether eselect should do that is a good question. The problem is, not all of the cblas interfaces have the same API, so pretending they're equal may not be a good idea.
Fixed in CVS, thanks!