Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 150197 - Emerge --resume history/queue?
Summary: Emerge --resume history/queue?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Enhancement/Feature Requests (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 150228 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-10-05 12:17 UTC by Alex Elsayed
Modified: 2006-10-05 22:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alex Elsayed 2006-10-05 12:17:20 UTC
I was recently performing several emerges at the same time while away, and one (emerge -e system after a libstdc++ upgrade) failed, followed by another emerge (emerge -u koffice-meta) failing. I couldn't resume the system emerge because the koffice-meta emerge had failed more recently,  so I had to start over. I propose that a "history" of, say, the last 5 failed emerges, end they may be listed by passing the --resume-list argument to emerge, and may be specified by passing --resume-? where ? is a whole number between 1 and 5, larger numbers indicating emerges further back in the history. This would permit as many as five concurrent emerges to fail without the risk of having to restart the emerge. I will endeavor to create a patch to provide this and will post it upon completion.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-05 14:44:30 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 150104 ***
Comment 2 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-10-05 17:32:51 UTC
The eselect module proposed in bug 150104 won't solve this.
Comment 3 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-10-05 17:34:37 UTC
Parallel emerge activities, though the may work in many cases, are completely unsupported at this time.  It is planned though.  See bug 147516.
Comment 4 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-10-05 22:42:39 UTC
*** Bug 150228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***