Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 149580 - blas-atlas and blas-lapack 3.6+ should not be marked as stable
Summary: blas-atlas and blas-lapack 3.6+ should not be marked as stable
Status: VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL: https://sourceforge.net/project/showf...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-29 21:07 UTC by Jon Bernard
Modified: 2006-09-30 00:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jon Bernard 2006-09-29 21:07:33 UTC 
According to the ATLAS web site, the last stable version is 3.6.0, but the ebuilds for 3.7.11 are marked as stable. If the developers mark a build as unstable, shouldn't Gentoo?
Comment 2 Jon Bernard 2006-09-30 00:38:47 UTC 
Quoting that link: "if Gimp decides to release an unstable/development series marked as 1.3.0, then these ebuilds should be put in package.mask because the software itself is of development quality and is not recommended by the developers for distribution."

So this should be masked.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-30 00:50:05 UTC 
Well no, it shouldn't. Feel free to file a bug if you have some problem, if you don't, then there's no point in filing bugs.