sparky / # updatedb sparky / # locate make.defaults /mnt/huge/portage/profiles/build/make.defaults /mnt/huge/portage/profiles/cdimage/make.defaults /mnt/huge/portage/profiles/default-1.0/make.defaults /mnt/huge/portage/profiles/default-1.0_rc6/make.defaults /mnt/huge/portage/profiles/default/make.defaults /usr/portage/profiles/build/make.defaults /usr/portage/profiles/cdimage/make.defaults /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0/make.defaults /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0_rc6/make.defaults /usr/portage/profiles/default/make.defaults /usr/share/man/man5/make.defaults.5.gz sparky / # ls -la /etc/make.profile/make.defaults -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 261 Apr 2 01:13 /etc/make.profile/make.defaults The desired file, under /etc exists, is not a symbolic or hard link, and is not excluded by any criterion I am aware of. Other files with the same basename are found correctly.
/etc/make.profile *is* a symlink (unless you've tweaked your current setup.)
The bug report is referring to /etc/make.defaults, NOT /etc/make.profile. Strangely enough I had equal trouble being understood on IRC . . . And yes, /etc/make/profile IS a symlink, I made it following your upgrade instructions. Anyway, back to /etc/make.profile/make.defaults . . .
Very sorry, tired.