Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 147393 - www-apache/mod_mono-1.1.16.1
Summary: www-apache/mod_mono-1.1.16.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Lance Albertson (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 135002
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-09-12 16:07 UTC by MT
Modified: 2006-10-27 08:05 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
www-apache/mod_mono-1.1.16.1.ebuild (mod_mono-1.1.16.1.ebuild,1.86 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-12 16:08 UTC, MT
Details
70_mod_mono.conf (70_mod_mono.conf,910 bytes, text/plain)
2006-09-12 16:08 UTC, MT
Details
www-apache/mod_mono-1.1.17.1.ebuild (mod_mono-1.1.17.1.ebuild,1.85 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-12 16:08 UTC, MT
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description MT 2006-09-12 16:07:18 UTC
version bump for www-apache/mod_mono
Comment 1 MT 2006-09-12 16:08:09 UTC
Created attachment 96843 [details]
www-apache/mod_mono-1.1.16.1.ebuild
Comment 2 MT 2006-09-12 16:08:30 UTC
Created attachment 96844 [details]
70_mod_mono.conf
Comment 3 MT 2006-09-12 16:08:55 UTC
Created attachment 96845 [details]
www-apache/mod_mono-1.1.17.1.ebuild
Comment 4 Jurek Bartuszek (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-30 13:36:06 UTC
There is no 1.1.17.1 version of mod_mono yet. Moreover, in your ebuild actually mod_mono-1.1.17 depends on xsp and mono >=1.1.17.1, which is wrong. Any 1.1.x.y packages should probably depend on >=1.1.x, but not the other way round. Otherwise this works fine for me.
Comment 5 Craig Andrews gentoo-dev 2006-10-09 14:50:30 UTC
This compiles and runs fine for me. The version in portage is *very* dated... hopefully we can expect a bump soon? :-)
Comment 6 Jurek Bartuszek (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-27 08:05:47 UTC
New versions of xsp and mod_mono are now in portage. Thanks!