As posted in the forums thread i linked, there's a typo: "emul-x86-linux-baselibs" should read: "emul-linux-x86-baselibs".
Corrected in cvs, thanks.
Fixed in CVS (yeah, it worked) after discussion with DerCorny. We weren't sure whether we should issue an errata. I suggest we do, since glsa-check would not be able to upgrade the package due to the wrong packe name. Jaervosz/Koon, pls. advise.
We should issue an Errata since users are not safe by applying the instructions in the GLSA. I'll draft one tomorrow if noone has done it before then.
I beat my self to it:-) Errata posted to security for review.
ERRATA mailed a week ago, forgot to close this one.