Bug 146333 – stabilise suspend2-sources-2.6.17

• Status: RESOLVED CANTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Iain Buchanan 2006-09-04 17:12:46 UTC]

There has been small talk on gentoo-user about stabilising suspend2-sources-2.6.17.  I've been using 2.6.17 evern since it made ~x86 up to the current -r5, and I haven't had any issues with it yet.  I've used with and without vesafb-tng, gensplash, radeonfb, suspend to disk, ati fglrx 8.28.8...

I have a Dell Inspiron 9100 laptop, ATI Mobility Radeon 9600.  Any more info I can provide?

[Comment 1 Iain Buchanan 2006-09-04 17:13:41 UTC]

Created attachment 96019 [details]
output from emerge --info

[Comment 2 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2006-09-26 08:30:47 UTC]

Still need to wait a bit, till I finished fixing/stabilizing hibernate-script-1.93 (that's needed/recommended with >=2.6.17). Currently I'm working on getting bug 146352 resolved, but its a bit hard since I can't reproduce it.

[Comment 3 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2006-09-26 11:54:47 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> Still need to wait a bit, till I finished fixing/stabilizing
> hibernate-script-1.93 (that's needed/recommended with >=2.6.17). Currently I'm
> working on getting bug 146352 resolved, but its a bit hard since I can't
> reproduce it.

OK, that helped. Just need to stabilize hibernate-script-1.93 before suspend2-sources-2.6.17 will go stable too! (that means 30 days from today)

[Comment 4 Alexander Skwar 2006-10-01 23:31:19 UTC]

*** Bug 146352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 5 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2006-10-04 02:47:05 UTC]

Removing the DEPEND on 146352, as its fixed in the current patch tarball. UPSTREAM agrees with me, that removing the dash-feature of hibernate-script is the best solveable way.

[Comment 6 Jochen Trumpf 2006-10-08 14:51:14 UTC]

Any chance of stabilizing 2.6.18 instead? I'd love to be able to use the in-kernel ieee80211 stack (and no, I won't run unstable sources ... ;-).

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2006-10-16 12:25:46 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Any chance of stabilizing 2.6.18 instead? I'd love to be able to use the
> in-kernel ieee80211 stack (and no, I won't run unstable sources ... ;-).
> 

You can try this "testing" version. You don't need to remove your old kernel and I am using 2.6.18 sources without problems (and latest hibernate-script ;-) also)

[Comment 8 Iain Buchanan 2006-10-16 16:34:56 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Any chance of stabilizing 2.6.18 instead? I'd love to be able to use the
> in-kernel ieee80211 stack (and no, I won't run unstable sources ... ;-).

let's leave 2.6.18 to it's own trial period! from the suspend2 list, there are still various problems with it :)

[Comment 9 Juergen Nagel 2006-11-18 11:58:55 UTC]

What's the current status concerning the stabilization?
2006-10-26 had been the target date according to comment #3. :)

[Comment 10 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2006-12-09 01:04:45 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> What's the current status concerning the stabilization?
> 2006-10-26 had been the target date according to comment #3. :)

Yup, I'm a slacker :)

[Comment 11 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2006-12-09 01:05:16 UTC]

Adding x86 for stabilization.

[Comment 12 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2006-12-09 02:10:41 UTC]

Closing, as the new target for stabilization is 2.6.18. New bug is 157584.