most of the madwifi package is GPL2 but there is also a proprietary/binary/closed source hal that ins
most of the madwifi package is GPL2 but there is also a proprietary/binary/closed source hal that ins´t gpl why is it important? ->because we tell me to bugreport it http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3555167.html#3555167 ->because of paludis that will be able to handle the licences of the packages
Plz. remove brix from metadata.xml.
thanks, fixed
*** Bug 167693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(I came across this because of the dupe...) "as-is" is not appropriate here. From portdir/licenses/as-is: <<< This is a generic place holder for a class of licenses that boil down to do no guarantees and all you get is what you have. The language is usually similar to: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided [...] Note: Most all license have an "as is" clause. For our purposes this does not make all software in this category. This category is for software with very little restrictions. >>> An important clause here: <<< * 1. The materials contained herein are unmodified and are used * unmodified. >>> Could you please add the actual license to the tree?
I did it for you.