Description: It would be nice to see a mixture of Kaffeine and amaroK in order to make a powerfull and rich media player in KDE. What is your opinion? (I saw that many users disagree on a mixture, so i change my propose) What about making amaroK playing video using an engine? (xine, mplayer, etc)
Don't restrict bugs without any reason. Just leave those checkboxes alone.
Call me stupid or You want ebuild for mockup?
Created attachment 95023 [details] Ebuild with support of nmm engine which able amarok to display video need >=media-libs/nmm-0.9* and nmm flag
(In reply to comment #0) > Description: > It would be nice to see a mixture of Kaffeine and amaroK in order to make a > powerfull and rich media player in KDE. What is your opinion? > (I saw that many users disagree on a mixture, so i change my propose) > > What about making amaroK playing video using an engine? (xine, mplayer, etc) > (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=95023) [edit] > Ebuild with support of nmm engine which able amarok to display video > > need >=media-libs/nmm-0.9* and nmm flag > doest matter which plugin, i just want to have one in portage, i know NMM for 6 months.. and what happend so far ? nothing.. if there is a reason (security) not to put nmm into portage so my request would be to take somediffrent plugin... THX A LOT
So you are essentially requesting someone patch amarok to support video, not create an ebuild. This probably is not going to have good results, and you will have even worse results with your attitude, if I do say so myself.
NFC what's this bug about. Kindly clarify how is this supposed to work, what's the attached ebuild about etc.
