After updating to X.org 7.0, I get this error when trying to open XnView: $ xnview somefile_or_somedir ** XnView v1.70 Copyright 1991-2005 Pierre-E Gougelet (Sep 6 2005/15:28:24) ** Version for Linux x86/Motif (All rights reserved) ** This is freeware software (for non commercial use) Type xnview -help, for more information X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist) Major opcode of failed request: 45 (X_OpenFont) Serial number of failed request: 929 Current serial number in output stream: 1092 Check this forum topic for a workaround: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-222743.html If this font must be installed, then it should be a dependency of xnview package, or of xorg-x11 package. Maybe add a meta-package xorg-common-fonts or something like this, to install most common needed fonts.
Fixed, thanks.
Not really fixed... Need to mark those font packages as stable. Should I submit another bug report or reopen this one? # emerge -pv xnview These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies - !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by "x11-misc/xnview-1.70-r1" [ebuild])
Those fonts should be stable along with modular X, please file another bug.
Krzysiek: You have "fixed" it only for 1.70, but not 1.50. And don't add a testing dependency again to stable ebuild, but contact the X11 team in advance. This tree breakage isn't acceptable. repoman should have warned you, no?!
(In reply to comment #4) > Krzysiek: You have "fixed" it only for 1.70, but not 1.50. On my TODO list for tomorrow. > And don't add a > testing dependency again to stable ebuild, but contact the X11 team in advance. My mistake - will fix. > This tree breakage isn't acceptable. repoman should have warned you, no?! No: nelchael@nelchael xnview$ pwd /home/nelchael/gentoo-x86/x11-misc/xnview nelchael@nelchael xnview$ repoman full Setting paths: PORTDIR = "/home/nelchael/gentoo-x86" PORTDIR_OVERLAY = "" RepoMan scours the neighborhood... digest.assumed 3 digest-xnview-1.50::XnView-static-1.50.ppc.rpm digest-xnview-1.50::XnView-static-1.50.i386.rpm digest-xnview-1.70-r1::XnView-x86-unknown-linux2.x-static-fc4.tgz RepoMan sez: "You're only giving me a partial QA payment? I'll take it this time, but I'm not happy." nelchael@nelchael xnview$
xnview-1.50-r1 and xnview-1.70-r2 contain the fix, keywords: Keywords for x11-misc/xnview: | a a a h i m m p p p s s s x x | l m r p a 6 i p p p 3 h p 8 8 | p d m p 6 8 p c c c 9 a 6 6 | h 6 a 4 k s 6 - 0 r - | a 4 4 m c f | a b | c s | o d | s --------+------------------------------ 1.50 | * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * 1.50-r1 | * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * 1.70-r1 | * * * * * * * * * * * * * + * 1.70-r2 | * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ *
I don't want to bother you a little more, but shouldn't the new version (with the fix) be marked stable? (since now both this and 140262 bugs are marked as fixed)
Well... On my system, the 100dpi font has been installed, and I kept getting that X_OpenFont error. This has only been fixed after emerging font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi. For me, only the 75dpi version was needed. I suggest adding dependency on both fonts. Sorry for not noticing this before.
It is fixed now, closing this bug.
