Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 137557 - request to bump tpm-emulator to v0.3
Summary: request to bump tpm-emulator to v0.3
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Crypto team [DISABLED]
URL: https://developer.berlios.de/projects...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-22 03:58 UTC by PaX Team
Modified: 2006-06-30 06:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description PaX Team 2006-06-22 03:58:15 UTC
per subject, i tested it on 2.6.17 and it compiles fine (current version in portage doesn't).
Comment 1 PaX Team 2006-06-22 04:01:40 UTC
forgot to add, the patch for removing 'inline' is no longer needed, the ebuild can be simplified by removing src_unpack altogether.
Comment 2 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-30 05:19:00 UTC
thankyou kindly.

If there is an easier way to deal with stack protector symbols in libgmp that you know of off hand thats really easy just let me know.

Anything more that a single line to force an additional symbol is probably too much.
Comment 3 PaX Team 2006-06-30 05:55:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> If there is an easier way to deal with stack protector symbols in libgmp that
> you know of off hand thats really easy just let me know.
> 
> Anything more that a single line to force an additional symbol is probably too
> much.

uhm, what's the issue with libgmp and ssp? also, it'd probably be better to discuss that in another bug or in email ;-).
Comment 4 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-06-30 06:31:01 UTC
> uhm, what's the issue with libgmp and ssp? also, it'd probably be better to
> discuss that in another bug or in email ;-).
> 
quite right - bug 138579