134970 – Add ~ppc to rox-base and rox-extras

Bug 134970 - Add ~ppc to rox-base and rox-extras

Summary: Add ~ppc to rox-base and rox-extras

Status:	VERIFIED NEEDINFO

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	PPC Other

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	PPC Porters

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-05-30 16:00 UTC by David Gurvich
Modified:	2006-07-08 15:53 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description David Gurvich 2006-05-30 16:00:05 UTC

So far rox-clib and pager are the only ones that need any modification for ppc, but that could just be a gcc-4.1 issue rather than ppc.  All the other packages in rox-base have compiled other than systemtray which depends on rox-clib.
All of them fail in the following fashion.  Looks like it may be simple to adjust.
 The rox-extra packages seem similar.  In addition, perhaps cdrecord-prodvd could also be marked ~ppc as I find it compiles cleanly for roxiso.

main.c:166: error: conflicting types for &#8216;ROXAppletInfo&#8217;
/usr/lib/ROX-CLib/Linux-ppc/include/applet.h:31: error: previous declaration of &#8216;ROXAppletInfo&#8217; was here

Comment 1 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-05-30 16:34:54 UTC

cdrecord-prodvd is an x86 binary.  That's not going to work on ppc and it will not be keyworded.  Can you be more specific about the packages that you want us to keyword?

Comment 2 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-07-08 15:12:28 UTC

ping?

Comment 3 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-07-08 15:22:36 UTC

Might not be a good idea to mark rox stuff as ~ppc right now. Rox is entirely unmaintained and most packages are a rev or two behind upstream.

Comment 4 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-07-08 15:53:34 UTC

Yes, I had a journey into rox-land earlier this day and found out, that both persons who took care for rox are no devs any more...

Just let us close this bug.

Step one...