Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 134697 - qt keyworded ~x86-fbsd, but qt-unixODBC isn't
Summary: qt keyworded ~x86-fbsd, but qt-unixODBC isn't
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo/BSD Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 149922 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-28 14:49 UTC by Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-10-03 00:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-28 14:49:33 UTC 
RepoMan scours the neighborhood...

  PDEPEND.bad                    2
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-multilib) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
  PDEPEND.badindev               5
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-symlinks) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: ~x86-fbsd(default-bsd/fbsd/6.0/x86) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: ~x86-fbsd(default-bsd/fbsd/6.1/x86) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6.ebuild: ~x86-fbsd(default-bsd/fbsd/6.0/x86) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6.ebuild: ~x86-fbsd(default-bsd/fbsd/6.1/x86) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
  digest.assumed                 2
   digest-qt-3.3.4-r8::qt-x11-immodule-unified-qt3.3.4-20041203.diff.bz2
   digest-qt-3.3.4-r9::qt-x11-immodule-unified-qt3.3.4-20041203.diff.bz2

Please fix these important QA issues first.
Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-28 14:50:51 UTC 
I know, but I haven't had time to fix it yet. The .badindev is _not_ fatal.
Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-28 15:15:39 UTC 
Prefixing with !x86-fbsd? until it's fixed would be much better. The portage tree isn't some overlay.
Comment 3 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-28 15:28:56 UTC 
That's what .badindev is started for in the first place. I can't start looking for tons of optional deps, nor I want to use.mask stuff, and worse than worse use inverse arch deps.

Mr_Bones_ already acknowledged that this way is non-intrusive and will allow Gentoo/FreeBSD users to have a working system and developers not to be bothered.

I'll be looking into it when I'll find a way to test it. In the mean time, it's a .badindev, indev.
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-03 00:40:14 UTC 
*** Bug 149922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***