# <liquidx@gentoo.org> (10 Mar 2003) # not really stable enough for my tastes. needs testing. dev-db/mergeant Not really stable, yet it has ebuilds marked stable for x86... If it's an old mask, punt it.
If it's OK with you, I would like to keep this package in the tree, and in p.mask. There should be a new mergeant stable version, as soon as the first releases of libgda/libgnomedb 2.0 are out. Problem is no-one really knows for sure when that will be. I've already talked with other members of the gnome herd about this package, and with mergeant's upstream developers and that is why I decided to be the maintainer of that port. If you want me to drop the stable keyword, or update the message in p.mask just let me know. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #1) > If it's OK with you, I would like to keep this package in the tree, and in > p.mask. > > There should be a new mergeant stable version, as soon as the first releases of > libgda/libgnomedb 2.0 are out. Problem is no-one really knows for sure when > that will be. > > I've already talked with other members of the gnome herd about this package, > and with mergeant's upstream developers and that is why I decided to be the > maintainer of that port. > > If you want me to drop the stable keyword, or update the message in p.mask just > let me know. > > Thanks. > An updated message in the package.mask file would be just fine ;) I do all the expirations by hand so there is no way I'd miss an "Updated 2006, waiting on new version" comment or whatnot. Feel free to keep it in the tree ;)
I've updated the p.mask entry. Thanks.
