Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 131869 - stricter gnome-keyring depedendency for evince-0.5.1
Summary: stricter gnome-keyring depedendency for evince-0.5.1
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-01 00:49 UTC by Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-05-02 08:09 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-01 00:49:33 UTC
checking for SHELL_CORE... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.6.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 libglade-2.0 gconf-2.0 poppler-glib >= 0.5.0 gnome-keyring-1 >= 0.4.0) were not met:

Requested 'gnome-keyring-1 >= 0.4.0' but version of gnome-keyring is 0.2.0

So I suggest to use ">= gnome-keyring-0.4.0"
Comment 1 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-01 11:53:13 UTC
There is no gnome-keyring-0.2.0 in portage. 0.4.2 is the lowest available version.
Comment 2 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-02 05:39:56 UTC
What about an old system like one I have? I still think an ebuild should describe  dependencies as exact as possible, not because of the current portage.
Comment 3 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-02 08:09:20 UTC
That's not my understanding of how it's supposed to work.  In this case, for example, there was no gnome-keyring that didn't satisfy the constraint in portage when the dep was added.  It's not like I took the >= away, it never existed.  I think when a new dep is added to a new version of a package, it's reasonable to assume people have up-to-date portage trees.