Bug 130882 – [STABLE REQUEST] dev-dotnet/nini-1.0.0-r1

• Status: RESOLVED LATER
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-04-22 12:54:57 UTC]

Standard song and dance

[Comment 1 Matthias Langer 2006-04-22 18:39:01 UTC]

I'm planning to do some testing with this library on x86. However, i'm not sure which version of dev-dotnet/nant (currently using 0.85_rc3-r1) i should test nini with.

[Comment 2 Matthias Langer 2006-04-22 19:39:46 UTC]

Well, here are my results for x86: nini-1.0.0-r1 seems to be ok. For testing i've pulled in dev-dotnet/nant-0.85_rc3-r1 and verified that things mentioned in http://nini.sourceforge.net/Manual/NiniManual-2.htm#GettingStarted actually work. If i should look out for something in particular, let me know.

 Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-3.4.5, glibc-2.3.5-r3, 2.6.16-gentoo-r3 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.16-gentoo-r3 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/eselect/compiler /etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig collision-protect distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.inode.at/ "
LANG="en_US.utf8"
LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
LINGUAS="en de"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://192.168.0.1/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aalib alsa apm audiofile avi berkdb bitmap-fonts bonobo bzip2 bzlib cairo cdr cli crypt css cups curl dbus divx4linux dri dts dv dvd dvdr dvdread emboss encode evo exif expat fam fame ffmpeg firefox flac foomaticdb fortran gd gdbm gif glut gmp gnome gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml guile hal idn imagemagick imlib ipv6 isdnlog java jpeg junit lcms libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx mmxext mng motif mp3 mpeg nautilus ncurses nls nptl nsplugin nvidia ogg oggvorbis openal opengl pam pcre pdflib perl plotutils png pppd python quicktime readline real reflection ruby sdl session slang speex spell spl sqlite sse ssl subtitles svga tcltk tcpd tetex theora tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb vcd video_cards_nvidia vorbis win32codecs wma xine xml xml2 xmms xorg xv xvid zlib linguas_en linguas_de userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LDFLAGS

[Comment 3 Luis Medinas (RETIRED) 2006-04-23 17:00:20 UTC]

i think nant should have more testing for amd64. Since mono is stable for only a 2 months and nant had some issues with the latest mono versions. We'll mark this stable later.

[Comment 4 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2006-04-28 17:27:35 UTC]

dotnet: Which version of nant should we be marking stable?  Thanks :)

[Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2006-05-17 14:52:08 UTC]

Please add us back to the bug when everything is ready to go stable.  Thanks.