Request to unmask rhythmbox with gstreamer-0.10 support. According to package.mask it is masked becouse of gstreamer-0.10 being masked while gstreamer-0.10.4 actually is marked stable.
(In reply to comment #0) > Request to unmask rhythmbox with gstreamer-0.10 support. > According to package.mask it is masked becouse of gstreamer-0.10 being masked > while gstreamer-0.10.4 actually is marked stable. > Yes please fix.
unmasked. Now makes sense to unmask it since gst 0.10 is working fine.
the question should not be if gst-0.10 is stable, but if rhythmbox 0.9 is more stable than 0.8 . more stable != more features.
i wouldn't like to stablize 0.9 series for now but sure it's ready for testing using gst 0.10. Maybe joem want's to tell something about it (he handled the previous versions.).