I'm using SBCL version 0.9.9 (~x86), and the package tries to downgrade common-lisp-controller from version 5.x to 4.x. I don't know if SBCL has any problems with the latest CLC version... I tested and it seems to work fine.
Created attachment 83851 [details] Fixed ebuild (latest) Here goes the latest ebuild (one line fix)
OK, I can probably apply your fix if you say SBCL 0.9.9 works well with the 5.x series common-lisp-controller. However the most recent version of SBCL for ~x86 keywords is 0.9.11 (added to portage at 2006/03/04 05:54:41). Is there any reason you need 0.9.9 or is it possible you emerge "synced" between the time clc 5.13 was committed (2006/04/01 19:49:47) and sbcl 0.9.11 was comitted? This bug report did remind me to commit the new >=common-lisp-controller-5 dependency for cmucl though :)
Sorry about the confusion! -- I hadn't committed sbcl-0.9.11, it was still sitting in my CVS workdir waiting for commit. I updated the dependency in both 0.9.9 and 0.9.11 ebuilds. Thanks for the note. *sbcl-0.9.11 (04 Apr 2006) 04 Apr 2006; Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org> -files/0.9.10/customize-target-features.lisp-prefix, -files/0.9.10/install-clc.lisp, +files/0.9.11/README.Gentoo, -files/0.9.10/customize-target-features.lisp-suffix, -files/0.9.10/sbcl.sh, +files/0.9.11/customize-target-features.lisp-prefix, -files/0.9.10/README.Gentoo, -files/0.9.10/sbcl-gentoo.patch, -files/0.9.10/sbclrc, +files/0.9.11/customize-target-features.lisp-suffix, +files/0.9.11/install-clc.lisp, +files/0.9.11/sbcl.sh, +files/0.9.11/sbcl-gentoo.patch, +files/0.9.11/sbclrc, sbcl-0.9.9.ebuild, -sbcl-0.9.10.ebuild, +sbcl-0.9.11.ebuild: New upstream version; Update dependencies for common-lisp-controller to >=dev-lisp/common-lisp-controller-4*; Resolves Bug #128717; Removed keyword masked sbcl-0.9.10.ebuild. 04 Mar 2006; Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org> sbcl-0.9.10.ebuild: Temporary -* masking due to problem with FASL output paths in CLC.
