Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 127676 - STLport-5.0.2 --with-boost configure option
Summary: STLport-5.0.2 --with-boost configure option
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: C++ Team [disbanded]
URL: http://stlport.sourceforge.net/News.s...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-26 15:01 UTC by Hanno Zysik (geki)
Modified: 2006-04-09 12:10 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
disable boost link, add extra cxxflags (STLport-5.0.2-boost.diff,458 bytes, patch)
2006-03-26 15:52 UTC, Hanno Zysik (geki) 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hanno Zysik (geki) 2006-03-26 15:01:24 UTC 
Since STLport-5.0.2 there is a --with-boost configure option.
Please add a boost useflag. Or alternatively hardwire one way.
Thanks!
Comment 1 Hanno Zysik (geki) 2006-03-26 15:52:46 UTC 
Created attachment 83198 [details, diff]
disable boost link, add extra cxxflags

Why I disable boost link?
I have a strange OOo2 issue which seems to be sourced from STLport<->Boost. I will see after recompile of OOo2.

Why I tweak the CXXFLAGS thing?
It did not care for the extra CXXFLAGS before.
Comment 2 Hanno Zysik (geki) 2006-03-29 04:28:55 UTC 
Ok, my OOo2 error is unrelated.
However, any reasons not to push into Portage?
Comment 3 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-08 20:59:00 UTC 
Agreed, boost doesn't look too useful right now.  Thanks a lot.
Comment 4 Hanno Zysik (geki) 2006-04-09 03:42:58 UTC 
Do I misunderstand something?
You say that boost does not look too useful right now but then you enable it in the ebuild?
Shouldn't there be '--without-boost'?
Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-09 12:10:17 UTC 
Nope, I'm just an idiot.  thanks for catching that :)