Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 127545 - sys-fs/captive revbump (?)
Summary: sys-fs/captive revbump (?)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor
Assignee: Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-25 09:56 UTC by Antonio
Modified: 2006-03-25 12:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Antonio 2006-03-25 09:56:36 UTC
Oh, man! Someone of developers updated ebuild but did not rename it from captive-1.1.7.ebuild to captive-1.1.7-r1.ebuild. Please do not do so! emerge told be that there was no update for package :( I lost a work day for finding out reason. Shame on this developer :(
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-25 10:27:16 UTC
Uhm? Why should we revbump it? There's no need to revbump an ebuild because of dependencies update.

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/captive/captive-1.1.7.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3

I don't see what sandbox crash and restart are you talking about, sorry.
Comment 2 Antonio 2006-03-25 10:34:27 UTC
Ok. At first I'm sorry for my rude tone/ I was very disapointed...

I mean that old version of ebuild contained link to source package named 

captive-1.1.7cvs.tar.gz

And the new one references

captive-1.1.7.tar.gz

New package contains a lot of fixes. But name of ebuild have not change and when I run

emerge -avu world

emerge told me nothing about improvements in this package. I hope it will help.
Comment 3 Antonio 2006-03-25 10:38:17 UTC
Of cource this ebuild works now, but is someone installed it earlier...
I think that it is needed to publish new ebuild with newer version but the same content in order to force rebuild :(   (but it is not programming, it's hack)
Comment 4 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-25 11:15:09 UTC
there have been only some utf8 changes (ie. minor, optical improvements) that do not justify a revision bump in my opinion. Can you tell me about your problem?

I will sure revbump it if I see a reason for it.
Comment 5 Antonio 2006-03-25 11:20:46 UTC
Here is my post to captive-list:

==================================================================
I'm trying to use captive with fuse. And it works for me quite good.
But sometimes it crashes :( For example during unpacking sources of
captive to ntfs drive. In syslog appears message.

Filesystem crash broke dirty object

As far as I understand from documentation sandbox master component
must restart sandbox and continue from last succeded point. but it
does not. Is iiit normal behaviour?

Additional info:

mount.captive-ntfs /dev/hda1 /mnt/tmp/ -o
Comment 6 Antonio 2006-03-25 11:20:46 UTC
Here is my post to captive-list:

==================================================================
I'm trying to use captive with fuse. And it works for me quite good.
But sometimes it crashes :( For example during unpacking sources of
captive to ntfs drive. In syslog appears message.

Filesystem crash broke dirty object

As far as I understand from documentation sandbox master component
must restart sandbox and continue from last succeded point. but it
does not. Is iiit normal behaviour?

Additional info:

mount.captive-ntfs /dev/hda1 /mnt/tmp/ -o
rw,--sandbox-server=/usr/libexec/captive-sandbox-server

tar -xzf /usr/portage/distfiles/captive-1.1.7cvs.tar.gz
=================================================================

And here is the ansver:

=================================================================
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:27:33 +0100, Antonio wrote:
...
> Filesystem crash broke dirty object
>
> As far as I understand from documentation sandbox master component
> must restart sandbox and continue from last succeded point.

Yes...

> but it does not. Is iiit normal behaviour?

It was a bug in 1.1.6.1 only, it should be fixed in 1.1.7 already, I hope.

...
> tar -xzf /usr/portage/distfiles/captive-1.1.7cvs.tar.gz
...
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/User:Antonio

Please check if your Gentoo-vendor package is really the final 1.1.7 - best try
the "captive-static" from my web (if it is compatible enough with Gentoo).
The "1.1.7cvs" looks as some pre-1.1.7 snapshot which may be without the
"restart" fix - check "src/client/fuse/main.c" to be revision >=1.15.
=================================================================

I checked and found this bug. Version of src/client/fuse/main.c in captive-1.1.7cvs.tar.gz was 1.14
Comment 7 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-25 12:00:14 UTC
thanks, I bumped the revision, thansk for reporting.