Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 125433 - bastardized files and sorting with ldconfig
Summary: bastardized files and sorting with ldconfig
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High major
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-07 19:32 UTC by Aaron
Modified: 2007-01-07 13:35 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Aaron 2006-03-07 19:32:34 UTC
sorry that this isnt very technical, i just spent 3 days breaking/deleting things, but this seems to be a bug in portages sorting order. when it sorts files, it does it from reverse, and i have two libc files in /lib, libc-2.3.6.so (the good one) and libc.2.3.3 (the bad one).

libc.2.3.3 hads a odd dot between libc and the version number, and no one wants to claim the file (equery turns up a blank), so im assuming its bastaerdized, and probably a old type form glibc-2.3.3. but this file was never unmerged, so apparently its been sitting here for a while.

when portage is cleaning up, it calls env-update, which seems to go through thte symlinks, and when it gets to /lib/libc.so.6, it finds a 'newer' version of libc, or atleast one that comes first if its reverse sorted. this then really screws up the system untill the file is deleted.

not sure how this would be fixed, or if its even valid anymore. i also dont know how many packages would be broken if it sorted by filename- so typoed files like that dont get sorted?

have fun.
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-03-07 19:39:52 UTC
what does `readelf -d libc.2.3.3` show
Comment 2 Aaron 2006-03-08 11:47:35 UTC
root@gentoo:: readelf -d libc.2.3.3.so                                      [~]

Dynamic section at offset 0x10bf5c contains 24 entries:
  Tag        Type                         Name/Value
 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [ld-linux.so.2]
 0x0000000e (SONAME)                     Library soname: [libc.so.6]
 0x0000000c (INIT)                       0x15750
 0x0000001a (FINI_ARRAY)                 0x10a71c
 0x0000001c (FINI_ARRAYSZ)               4 (bytes)
 0x00000004 (HASH)                       0x174
 0x00000005 (STRTAB)                     0xbfc4
 0x00000006 (SYMTAB)                     0x3454
 0x0000000a (STRSZ)                      21213 (bytes)
 0x0000000b (SYMENT)                     16 (bytes)
 0x00000003 (PLTGOT)                     0x10d0a8
 0x00000002 (PLTRELSZ)                   232 (bytes)
 0x00000014 (PLTREL)                     REL
 0x00000017 (JMPREL)                     0x153f0
 0x00000011 (REL)                        0x126c0
 0x00000012 (RELSZ)                      11568 (bytes)
 0x00000013 (RELENT)                     8 (bytes)
 0x6ffffffc (VERDEF)                     0x12410
 0x6ffffffd (VERDEFNUM)                  18
 0x6ffffffe (VERNEED)                    0x12680
 0x6fffffff (VERNEEDNUM)                 1
 0x6ffffff0 (VERSYM)                     0x112a2
 0x6ffffffa (RELCOUNT)                   1347
 0x00000000 (NULL)                       0x0
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-03-08 13:40:13 UTC
i really havent the foggiest where libc.2.3.3 came from, but the changing of the links has nothing to do with portage

the tool that does it is called 'ldconfig' and it comes with glibc
Comment 4 Aaron 2006-03-08 15:40:07 UTC
probably came form glibc-2.3.3, but i dont know how it got there, unless glibc people had a typo?

but portage broke the symlinks on emerges, ldconfigs, env-updates, and gcc-config
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-01-07 13:35:07 UTC
this is by design

if more than 1 file provides the same SONAME, then ldconfig performs an ASCII comparison on the names to decides who wins

in ASCII, the dash ('-') comes before the dot ('.'), so any file named 'libc.' will win over any file named 'libc-'

in your case, you have libc-2.3.6.so and libc.2.3.3 and so libc.2.3.3 won