Bug 124880 – ufraw-0.7.ebuild

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-03 15:50:20 UTC]

[Ufraw-announce] UFRaw-0.7 Released

UFRaw-0.7 is now finally released. The biggest changes in this version
are an improved calculation of color temperature and per camera white
balance presets. We currently have these presets for 30 cameras only.
If your camera is not supported, then check:

http://ufraw.sourceforge.net/Contribute.html

for details on how to supply us with this information.

New cameras supported in this version (thanks to dcraw 8.05) include:

* Canon EOS-1D Mark II N
* Fuji FinePix E900
* Nikon D200
* Olympus C3030Z
* Olympus C7070WZ
* Olympus SP500UZ
* Phase One P 30
* Phase One P 45

More changes include:

* Show the channel multipliers in the UI.
* Apply base curve before gamma curve.
* Fix a few general bugs.
* Fix camera specific bugs for Sony F828, Sigma Foveon, Nikon D2H, D1X.

Have fun and report any problems,
Udi

[Comment 1 Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-03 15:55:46 UTC]

Created attachment 81243 [details]
ufraw-0.7.ebuild

[Comment 2 Paul de Vries 2006-03-04 02:50:07 UTC]

ebuild does not build with libexif, even with exif flag switch on. Ufraw configure needs flag: --with-libexif to use libexif and not --enable-exif  as currenlty used:
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --enable-gimp --enable-exif --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Comment 3 Paul de Vries 2006-03-04 03:43:39 UTC]

Since of 0.7 for exif support libexif >= 0.6.13 is needed.

[Comment 4 Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-04 22:21:16 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Since of 0.7 for exif support libexif >= 0.6.13 is needed.
> 

sf.net: libexif-0.6.13.tar.gz is broken
e672f7633ef70e2decbb6b0cee9d484a  libexif-0.6.13.tar.gz

...
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now

[Comment 5 Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-04 22:44:24 UTC]

Created attachment 81367 [details]
ufraw-0.7-r1.ebuild

removed all exif items

[Comment 6 Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-04 22:48:51 UTC]

Comment on attachment 81367 [details]
ufraw-0.7-r1.ebuild

I prefer Phil Harvey's
exiftool 
(Image::Exiftool)

never used exif in ufraw

[Comment 7 Paul de Vries 2006-03-05 01:01:14 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Since of 0.7 for exif support libexif >= 0.6.13 is needed.
> > 
> 
> sf.net: libexif-0.6.13.tar.gz is broken
> e672f7633ef70e2decbb6b0cee9d484a  libexif-0.6.13.tar.gz
>
yes, but libexif-0.6.13.tar.bz2 is OK.

[Comment 8 Paul de Vries 2006-03-05 02:54:23 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
I have posted an ebuild for libexif-0.6.13 (bug: 117894 ) with this I am able to build ufraw-0.7 with exif working correctly. 

[Comment 9 Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-06 14:23:47 UTC]

Created attachment 81562 [details]
ufraw-0.7.ebuild

+with libexif as of bug 117894
+einfo about usability of exif

[Comment 10 Wolfgang Goetz 2006-03-07 11:50:15 UTC]

Created attachment 81630 [details]
ufraw-0.7.ebuild

Valid Header again (just looked at 'Common ebuild Mistakes', sorry)

[Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-03-18 02:26:18 UTC]

*** Bug 126632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 12 Alexandre Buisse (RETIRED) 2006-03-31 08:22:15 UTC]

I'm not sure I understand the point of the einfo in this ebuild. I could also add einfo "vim is better than emacs" but I don't think that would be very useful either.
On the other hand, if exiftool can be used as a replacement of libexif (which I don't think is the case), then it should say so in DEPEND.

[Comment 13 Alexandre Buisse (RETIRED) 2006-04-01 05:57:54 UTC]

ufraw-0.7 has been added to portage.