Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 124474 - ebuild for librpcsecgss
Summary: ebuild for librpcsecgss
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Network Filesystems
URL: http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nf...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on: 124473
Blocks: 136038
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-02-28 16:14 UTC by Bryce Harrington
Modified: 2006-08-01 16:10 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild for librpcsecgss (librpcsecgss-0.7.ebuild,642 bytes, text/plain)
2006-02-28 16:16 UTC, Bryce Harrington
Details
license for librpcsecgss (sun-rpc-um,2.85 KB, text/plain)
2006-02-28 16:17 UTC, Bryce Harrington
Details
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild (librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild,858 bytes, text/plain)
2006-06-03 23:42 UTC, Mario Fetka (geos_one)
Details
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild (librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild,788 bytes, text/plain)
2006-06-08 02:21 UTC, Mario Fetka (geos_one)
Details
librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch (librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch,987 bytes, patch)
2006-06-08 02:21 UTC, Mario Fetka (geos_one)
Details | Diff
librpcsecgss-0.13.ebuild (librpcsecgss-0.13.ebuild,794 bytes, text/plain)
2006-06-14 06:00 UTC, Mario Fetka (geos_one)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:14:52 UTC
This is the gssapi implementation file for using NFSv4 securely.  It implements the rpcsec_gss protocol for NFSv4 to have secure rpc communication.

This requires libgssapi, which I've submitted separately.

A basic ebuild and license will be attached.
Comment 1 Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:16:13 UTC
Created attachment 81000 [details]
ebuild for librpcsecgss
Comment 2 Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:17:22 UTC
Created attachment 81001 [details]
license for librpcsecgss
Comment 3 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-03 23:42:52 UTC
Created attachment 88321 [details]
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild

Update for the ebuild
Comment 4 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-08 02:21:21 UTC
Created attachment 88644 [details]
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild
Comment 5 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-08 02:21:52 UTC
Created attachment 88646 [details, diff]
librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch
Comment 6 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-06-11 03:21:17 UTC
wondering who should take this ... or if we should do a dual herd thing ...
Comment 7 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-11 22:37:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> wondering who should take this ... or if we should do a dual herd thing ...
> 
i think this is a package for nfs4@gentoo.org

Comment 8 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-11 22:41:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=88646) [edit]
> librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch
> 
the reason for this patch ist a dependency tree:
libgssapi --> mit-krb5 --> librpcsecgss --> nfs-utils
or
heimdal --> librpcsecgss --> nfs-utils
Comment 9 Michael Helmling 2006-06-13 10:09:09 UTC
This ebuild should depend on libgssapi, since it doesn't compile without it.
Comment 10 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-13 10:24:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> This ebuild should depend on libgssapi, since it doesn't compile without it.
> 
this ebuild depends on bug 136039 

mit-krb5 doesn't provide libgssapi only his own libgssapi_krb5 (spezial krb5 version)
so mit-krb5 should depend on libgssapi.
if you use heimdal then you already have libgssapi.so.4 so no need to install libgssapi.so.2
and i think there should not be 2 libs with same functionality on the system.
Comment 11 Michael Helmling 2006-06-13 10:34:12 UTC
Ah ok. I only installed the bugzilla version of librpcsecgss and not the mit-krb5 version from here. In this situation I wondered why it didn't depend on gssapi, but I think now it's clear. :)
Comment 12 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-06-14 06:00:17 UTC
Created attachment 89146 [details]
librpcsecgss-0.13.ebuild

version bump
Comment 13 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-01 02:03:42 UTC
now in portage, shall we close/reassign bug ?
Comment 14 Mario Fetka (geos_one) 2006-08-01 04:47:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> now in portage, shall we close/reassign bug ?
> 
close the bug
Comment 15 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-08-01 16:10:30 UTC
in cvs