Bug 123233 – Cannot build flex-2.5.31 on Gentoo/*BSD

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo/Alt

[Description Benigno B. Junior (RETIRED) 2006-02-17 22:55:31 UTC]

The patch "flex-2.5.31-isatty.patch" is killing the flex of being compiled on G/NBSD. According to bug #119598, this patch is needed to build doxygen (USE=qt), and I could see this, really. The only problem I've found with this patch is the __THROW used in scan.c (the other in skel.c does not affect here). So I dropped this and it works fine here and on Linux (I tested building doxygen with USE=qt).

Please, people from others BSD's, could confirm this? I'm attaching the patch that worked.

[Comment 1 Benigno B. Junior (RETIRED) 2006-02-17 22:56:25 UTC]

Created attachment 80064 [details, diff]
flex-2.5.31-scan.c.patch

There it goes.

[Comment 2 Robert Sebastian Gerus 2006-02-18 00:36:18 UTC]

Compiled on DragonFly with this patch. Failed without it.

[Comment 3 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2006-02-18 03:37:57 UTC]

The problem is that __THROW is an extra specifier that's added by glibc, so BSD systems using non-GNU libcs are breaking.
Just removing it from the patch solves the problem in a quicker way.
I wonder if uclibc still builds flex fine.

Anyway, reassigning to base system, although I'm losing flex++ on my fbsd system with the new version, but probably it's a different problem.

[Comment 4 SpanKY 2006-02-18 11:32:48 UTC]

Comment on attachment 80064 [details, diff]
flex-2.5.31-scan.c.patch

no, patch is incorrect

[Comment 5 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2006-02-18 11:42:04 UTC]

Which one? The one currently in portage or this one?

[Comment 6 Benigno B. Junior (RETIRED) 2006-02-18 12:55:56 UTC]

lol, I didn't put this "patch" to be a real patch for anything. If something is wrong, vapier did it. I was just showing this is not acceptable for us.

[Comment 7 SpanKY 2006-02-18 13:53:52 UTC]

i meant the posted patch is wrong

fixed in cvs