I have been using this package daily for the last year or so, and have had absolutely no problems with it (using tetex 2). Could it be marked stable? My emerge --info: Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.14.2 x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.14.2 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14 dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.22 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="amd64 X acpi aim alsa amd ansi arts artswrappersuid audiofile avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts bmp bzip2 cardbus cdr cdrom cpudetection crypt cups curl doc dpms dri dvd dvdr dvdread eds emboss emul-linux-x86 encode esd exif expat fam ffmpeg fftw firefox flash foomaticdb fortran ftp gd gdbm gif glut gmail gmailtimestamps gmp gnuplot gpm graphviz gs gsl gstreamer gtk gtk2 guile idn imagemagick imlib ipv6 jabber java jpeg junit kde kdeenablefinal latex lcms libwww lzw lzw-tiff mad mime mng mozilla mp3 mpeg mppe-mppc msn mupad-noscilab ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nsplugin ntfs ogg opengl oss pam pcmcia pcre pdf pdflib perl png python qt quicktime readline real ruby samba sdl server spell ssl subversion tcltk tcpd tetex tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev usb userlocales v4l vcd videos vorbis wifi xine xml2 xpm xscreensaver xv yahoo zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, MAKEOPTS
You should add the arch teams in Cc when filing such requests. I can't test the package on amd64 but I did on x86 and it seems to me it can be stabilized (no open bugs either). Arch teams, please advise.
I have tested it on my amd64 box, and no problems here either, so it should be a go.
stable on amd64. Added ppc to the arch list so they can get it too.
stable on x86
Stable on ppc. Closing since we're last arch
