There's a new ipkungfu version.
Created attachment 76651 [details] ipkungfu 0.6.0 ebuild
Created attachment 76652 [details] updated init script updated init script, so that no output is made, when there should be none
Please, any bugs found on ipkungfu-0.6.0 should also be submitted to grasshopper@linuxkungfu.org, ufs@ufsoft.org, or even better, http://ipkungfu.ufsoft.org
Created attachment 77373 [details, diff] Fixes for 0.6.0 ebuild Here are some updates for that ebuild. * SRC_URI was wrong (.bz2 should be .gz) * keyword fix (change x86 to ~x86) * fix spelling errors * clarified notice about configuration changes.
(In reply to comment #4) > * SRC_URI was wrong (.bz2 should be .gz) Why wrong, both packages existed last time I checked. Does Gentoo prefer gz over bz2?
I initially tried your ebuild without changes and I thought I got a 404 on the .bz2. It does seem to work at the moment, however. I have no objections to using .bz2, though their main link is for the .gz, and Gentoo preferentially uses .bz2. Originally I was modifying one my old ebuilds from 0.6.0_alpha2 which was never in Portage, and was using the .gz version.
(In reply to comment #6) > ... though their main link is for the .gz You mean our main link ;) If you analyse a bit ufs@sapo.pt(me) is ufs@ufsoft.org, one of the devs, and from now on we build both .gz and .bz2, so choose wichever is better for Gentoo. Id like if you could, re-read comment #3, ie, do submit any found bugs to our dev site http://ipkungfu.ufsoft.org or mail it to Rocco or me, both mails are on that comment, so we can fix it. Thanks for the attention.
i was supposed to take this package i will update metadat.xml when i make the commit for 0.6.0
committed the metadata change now too thanks
