Bug 117792 – dev-python/scientificpython-2.5.7 (development release), license change

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-04 14:23:26 UTC]

Attached is a patch for current developement release of ScientificPython. I think it would be nice to have it in portage and marked as testing.

Please also note that ScientificPython is now hosted on: https://sourcesup.cru.fr/projects/scientific-py/ and has a new license: CeCILL which is compatibile with GPL and French legal system. More on this is on MMTK list: http://starship.python.net/pipermail/mmtk/2005/000994.html

[Comment 1 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-04 14:24:52 UTC]

Created attachment 76186 [details, diff]
scientificpython-2.4.9.ebuild -> scientificpython/scientificpython-2.4.9.ebuild

[Comment 2 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-04 14:25:56 UTC]

Created attachment 76187 [details]
CeCILL FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

(english version)

[Comment 3 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-04 14:31:31 UTC]

And maybe DESCRIPTION could be changed to what is on project website: 

ScientificPython is a collection of Python modules for scientific computing. It contains support for geometry, mathematical functions, statistics, physical units, IO, visualization, and parallelization.

Paralelization is not supported by this ebuild, though.

[Comment 4 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-20 10:17:29 UTC]

Created attachment 77659 [details]
scientificpython-2.5.7-r1.ebuild

[Comment 5 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-20 10:17:57 UTC]

Created attachment 77660 [details, diff]
2.5.7-PDB-syntax.diff

[Comment 6 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-01-20 10:19:34 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=77659) [edit]
> scientificpython-2.5.7-r1.ebuild

fixed bug in PDB.py

[Comment 7 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) 2006-06-08 14:27:41 UTC]

Is there some way to avoid that annoying hardcoded per-version number in SRC_URI?

[Comment 8 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-06-25 16:35:02 UTC]

Created attachment 90155 [details]
scientificpython-2.5.9.ebuild

There is a new version...

[Comment 9 Jaroslaw Kalinowski 2006-06-25 16:37:00 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Is there some way to avoid that annoying hardcoded
> per-version number in> SRC_URI?

Unfortunately is seems that it is hardcoded...

[Comment 10 Sébastien Fabbro (RETIRED) 2006-09-13 09:24:20 UTC]

I put both the stable 2.4.11 and the development 2.5.11 versions in the http://gentooscience.org overlay. Please report any bug here.

[Comment 11 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) 2006-10-16 20:58:20 UTC]

2.6 is in CVS now, thanks!