Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 117322 - Stable SUN JDK 1.4.2-10 is REALLY a 1.5.0...
Summary: Stable SUN JDK 1.4.2-10 is REALLY a 1.5.0...
Status: RESOLVED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High critical (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL: http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/W...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-31 22:48 UTC by Steve Egbert
Modified: 2006-01-01 14:56 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steve Egbert 2005-12-31 22:48:40 UTC
Repeated downloads from SUN JAVA (see URL above) for 1.4.2-10 results in the following outputs.

If Sun can't get their act together, I'm thinking that we should mark 1.4.2-10 as 'unstable' and go back to 1.4.2-09.


# links http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=22&PartDetailId=j2sdk-1.4.2_10-oth-JPR&SiteId=JSC&TransactionId=noreg
# mv j2sdk-1_4_2_10-linux-i586.bin /usr/portage/distfiles/
# emerge sun-jdk
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 to /
!!! Security Violation: A file exists that is not in the manifest.
!!! File: files/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05
Comment 1 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-01 03:30:31 UTC
This does not have anything to do with Sun.

>>> emerge (1 of 1) dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 to /
!!! Security Violation: A file exists that is not in the manifest.
!!! File: files/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05

This means that there is an extra file in the Manifest file which is used to record hashes of files for security purposes. Sometimes our mirroring starts at the same time as a CVS commit is going on which results in a security violation because the tree does not reflect CVS properly. Please try emerge sync again and reopen if this problem still exists.
Comment 2 Steve Egbert 2006-01-01 14:56:10 UTC
Thank you for the concise detail.

This 'emerge sync' Security Violation has been happening to several different packages across my many Gentoo 2005.1 platforms over the last few remaining days of 2005...

Wondered if there is a pending bug and/or fix for some kind of critical section/transactional transition and/or protection against these messages against the described CVS commit vs. tree-update?