tcc-0.9.19 fails to compile on my machine, but 0.9.22 compiles normally. Testing 0.9.22 on various scripts also went fine. Please mark tcc-0.9.22 stable :) imsg3box ~ # emerge -av tcc These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N ] dev-lang/tcc-0.9.19 193 kB Total size of downloads: 193 kB <snip> ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu Binary directory /usr/bin Library directory /usr/lib Include directory /usr/include Manual directory /usr/share/man Source path /var/tmp/portage/tcc-0.9.19/work/tcc-0.9.19 C compiler gcc make make CPU x86 Big Endian no gprof enabled no Creating config.mak and config.h gcc -O2 -g -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -falign-functions=0 -o tcc_g tcc.c -ldl gcc -O2 -Wall -c -o libtcc1.o libtcc1.c gcc -O2 -Wall -c -o bcheck.o bcheck.c gcc -O2 -g -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -falign-functions=0 -DLIBTCC -c -o libtcc.o tcc.c bcheck.c:172: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_add' bcheck.c:80: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_add' was here bcheck.c:172: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_add' bcheck.c:80: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_add' was here bcheck.c:231: error: conflicting types for '__bound_local_new' bcheck.c:87: error: previous declaration of '__bound_local_new' was here bcheck.c:231: error: conflicting types for '__bound_local_new' bcheck.c:87: error: previous declaration of '__bound_local_new' was here bcheck.c:247: error: conflicting types for '__bound_local_delete' bcheck.c:88: error: previous declaration of '__bound_local_delete' was here bcheck.c:247: error: conflicting types for '__bound_local_delete' bcheck.c:88: error: previous declaration of '__bound_local_delete' was here bcheck.c:281: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir1' bcheck.c:81: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir1' was here bcheck.c:281: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir1' bcheck.c:81: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir1' was here bcheck.c:282: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir2' bcheck.c:82: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir2' was here bcheck.c:282: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir2' bcheck.c:82: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir2' was here bcheck.c:283: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir4' bcheck.c:83: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir4' was here bcheck.c:283: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir4' bcheck.c:83: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir4' was here bcheck.c:284: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir8' bcheck.c:84: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir8' was here bcheck.c:284: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir8' bcheck.c:84: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir8' was here bcheck.c:285: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir12' bcheck.c:85: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir12' was here bcheck.c:285: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir12' bcheck.c:85: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir12' was here bcheck.c:286: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir16' bcheck.c:86: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir16' was here bcheck.c:286: error: conflicting types for '__bound_ptr_indir16' bcheck.c:86: error: previous declaration of '__bound_ptr_indir16' was here make: *** [bcheck.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... tcc.c: In function `ieee_finite': tcc.c:842: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules tcc.c: In function `main': tcc.c:9708: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules tcc.c:9779: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules tcc.c: In function `ieee_finite': tcc.c:842: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules !!! ERROR: dev-lang/tcc-0.9.19 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 19, Exitcode 2 !!! (no error message) !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. ---- imsg3box ~ # emerge --info Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r3, 2.6.14-gentoo-r2-undine i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.14-gentoo-r2-undine i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13 ccache version 2.3 [enabled] dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.20 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O1 -march=pentium4 -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/splash /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O1 -march=pentium4 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GENTOO http://gentoo.gg3.net http://gentoo.channelx.biz http://ftp.gentoo.or.kr http://mirror.gentoo.gr.jp" LANG="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8" MAKEOPTS="-j3" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="x86 X aac alsa apache2 apm audiofile avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts bmp bonobo browserplugin bzip2 cdr cjk crypt cups curl directfb eds emboss encode esd exif expat fam ffmpeg flac foomaticdb fortran ftp gd gdbm gif glut gmp gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml howl iconv idn ieee1394 imagemagick imlib ipv6 java javascript jikes jpeg junit lcms ldap libg++ libwww lua mad matroska mhash migemo mikmod mime mmx mmxext mng motif mozilla mp3 mpeg mysql ncurses nls nptl nsplugin nvidia ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pcre pdflib perl php png python quicktime readline real recode samba sdl speex spell sse ssl svg szip tcltk tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode verbose vorbis win32codecs wmf xine xml xml2 xosd xv xvid yahoo zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS
Thanks for a report! Hm, I don't feel well about moving stuff into stable that I cannot test, as I am on amd64 now and this package does not recognize this cpu :(. However I hope to get 32bit chroot going in about a month (its a space problem currently, laptop hard drives are not that big, need some external drive..) and then I'll be happy to move it into stable. That is unless somebody does that before I can, of course. Spider: you did an update, so here is a hint for you ;). Oh, and there is that bug #109729 you might want to bump it as well, if you wish. Otherwise I'll do this when I have 32bit chroot going.. Meanwhile you can stick dev-lang/tcc-0.9.22 ~x86 into your /etc/portage/package.keywords.. Also, Stephanie: I see you put -* there, claiming that other arches are unsupported, but I see this in configure script: if test "$cpu" = "x86" ; then echo "ARCH=i386" >> config.mak echo "#define HOST_I386 1" >> $TMPH elif test "$cpu" = "armv4l" ; then echo "ARCH=arm" >> config.mak echo "#define HOST_ARM 1" >> $TMPH elif test "$cpu" = "powerpc" ; then echo "ARCH=ppc" >> config.mak echo "#define HOST_PPC 1" >> $TMPH elif test "$cpu" = "mips" ; then echo "ARCH=mips" >> config.mak echo "#define HOST_MIPS 1" >> $TMPH elif test "$cpu" = "s390" ; then echo "ARCH=s390" >> config.mak echo "#define HOST_S390 1" >> $TMPH elif test "$cpu" = "alpha" ; then echo "ARCH=alpha" >> config.mak echo "#define HOST_ALPHA 1" >> $TMPH else echo "Unsupported CPU" exit 1 fi and some other interesting stuff, which really looks like support for some arches other than x86.. Can you please comment on that? George
Thanks for the marking ~x86 into package.keywords advice :) And please take your time :) It's not something urgent or anything anyway :) Oh, and merry christmas ^^ (yes I know it's weird to write this in a bug report .. but .. christmas is here, isn't it ? ^^) PS : what are the "testing for stable" procedures ? .. I mean, for this package ..
Ok, I got my 32bit chroot up and tested this package. It seems fine and, considering how long it was in the tree, I think it indeed should go stable. However accordingly to the present policy x86 arch team should do this, as lang-misc has no "special" arrangements. Reassigning this bug to them (sorry, I should have done this earlier, but why whoever wrangled this bug did not assign it to arch team anyway?), x86 team: please stabilize this one! George
Stable on x86. The bug should first go to the maintainer so they can tell us if the package should be stable or not, then we'll test it and proceed :)
