Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 11565 - sys-devel/ld.so is no longer in portage and causes dependecy problems with packages
Summary: sys-devel/ld.so is no longer in portage and causes dependecy problems with pa...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High critical (vote)
Assignee: Donny Davies (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-12-04 04:32 UTC by Brad Cowan (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-03-03 04:36 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Brad Cowan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-04 04:32:00 UTC
Here is a script to list the bad packages that are blocking some things for
people as sys-devel/ld.so is no longer a separate package, therefore nothing
should depend on this package.

find /usr/portage -type f -mindepth 3 -maxdepth 3 -name '*.ebuild' | xargs grep
"sys-devel/ld.so" | sed 's|/usr/portage/||g;s/\:.*$//g;s/\/.*\//\//g'
Comment 1 Brad Cowan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-04 10:59:12 UTC
well Nall just posted an email to -core showing broken packages. I know for a fact
this ld.so depend is a showstopper on that list.....the first 100 or so packages
on the list for ppc are due to kde-libs-2.2.2 which depends on ld.so
ebuild...thats not even taking into account all the other platforms.
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2002-12-04 11:56:25 UTC
actually it is in cvs 
this package has always freaked me out cause my local rsync copies *never* matched 
cvs ... 
 
http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/ld.so/ 
Comment 3 Michael Stewart (vericgar) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-08 05:58:05 UTC
I just went to do an emerge --update world and got many errors with KDE that  relate to this:    (example)  emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy "sys-devel/ld.so"  (from ebuild / kde-base/arts-1.0.4 merge).       I have also just done a fresh emerge rsync. I'm seeing in CVS where there is the sys-devel/ld.so directory, but that is not on my system. Are there problems with the rsync mirrors and this not being propogated to them?   mooncougar sys-devel # pwd /usr/portage/sys-devel mooncougar sys-devel # ls -a .         autoproject  bison         flex        gdb      m4     pmake ..        bc           cons          gcc         gecc     make   prelink autoconf  bin86        distcc        gcc-compat  gettext  patch  sparc32 automake  binutils     egcs64-sparc  gcc-config  libtool  perl   spython 
Comment 4 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-08 13:21:05 UTC
Donny, this is your baby, as I have not touched the profiles with relation
to this :P
Comment 5 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-08 15:02:03 UTC
Make a virtual for it in the glibc ebuild.
Comment 6 Donny Davies (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-08 15:38:04 UTC
the posted find command returns nothing for me.

however my own search shows only a very small amount
of ebuilds with ld.so in their DEPEND.  some are in ebuilds
for which there is a newer one available;  fex: noflushd
in which the newest doesnt DEPEND on it but the older one
does.

i thought i went through the portage tree and made sure that
nobody would be getting ld.so by default anymore.

i asked/told danarmak to remove ld.so from KDE because it
wasnt needed.  i know he nuked it from his kde eclass
but you'll have to ask him why its still in the kde 2.x ebuilds.

is there something else here im supposed to do?


Comment 7 Brad Cowan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-08 21:48:25 UTC
hmm the one liner works here is /usr/portage is your portdir, but who cares
anyway looks like most of them have been taken care of now :) here's what I came
up with thats still floating around out there:

sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r8.ebuild
sys-apps/noflushd-2.4-r3.ebuild
sys-apps/noflushd-2.4-r6.ebuild
net-im/gnophone-0.2.4.ebuild
net-im/gnophone-0.2.4.ebuild
dev-lang/bigwig-2.0-r7.ebuild

Comment 8 Brad Cowan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-17 12:02:15 UTC
pretty much all taken care of :)
Comment 9 Rigo 2003-03-03 04:36:44 UTC
Hmmm, an emerge -pU --deep world overhere still got errors on these:

dev-db/sqsh/sqsh-2.1.ebuild
dev-lang/bigwig/bigwig-2.0-r7.ebuild
net-im/gnophone/gnophone-0.2.4.ebuild
sys-apps/noflushd/noflushd-2.4-r3.ebuild
sys-apps/noflushd/noflushd-2.4-r6.ebuild

Regards, Rogi