Similar to bug #115525, this time for rox-extra/find. Here's the diff: Index: find-0.0.5.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/rox-extra/find/find-0.0.5.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -B -r1.1 find-0.0.5.ebuild --- find-0.0.5.ebuild 23 Oct 2005 19:28:26 -0000 1.1 +++ find-0.0.5.ebuild 14 Dec 2005 13:43:20 -0000 @@ -2,14 +2,13 @@ # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/rox-extra/find/find-0.0.5.ebuild,v 1.1 2005/10/23 19:28:26 svyatogor Exp $ -inherit rox +inherit versionator rox -MY_PN="Find" -MY_PV=`echo ${PV} | sed -e 's/\.//g'` +MY_P=${PN/f/F}-$(replace_all_version_separators '') DESCRIPTION="Find - A file Finder utility for ROX by Ken Hayber." HOMEPAGE="http://www.hayber.us/rox/Find" -SRC_URI="http://www.hayber.us/rox/find/${MY_PN}-${MY_PV}.tgz" +SRC_URI="http://www.hayber.us/rox/find/${MY_P}.tgz" LICENSE="GPL-2" SLOT="0"
turns out you can even use $(delete_all_version_separators) instead of the replace call that I make (that makes it more readable if you do the delete instead of the replace). Applies to bug #115525
see bug #107080 for the original ebuild I submitted. This issue should not be occuring. See more detailed comments of mine at bug #115525
same comment as 115526
Accepted, understood, fixed. I will fix other ebuilds as well. Peter: now that I have my inet back (56k for over a week doesn't count) I will start checking the ebuilds and prepare a bid ~x86 -> x86 for our x86-arch team.
