Bug 115113 – Mark net-misc/sobby-0.3.0 stable

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Gustavo Felisberto (RETIRED) 2005-12-10 10:53:07 UTC]

Can someone remove the ~ on this package AND net-misc/sobby-0.3.0 and
net-libs/obby-0.3.0 and net-libs/net6-1.2.2

[Comment 1 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-12-10 15:02:17 UTC]

Do you mean 0.2.2?  You just added the 0.3.x stuff yesterday.

What looks sane to me to have marked stable are the follow:
app-editors/gobby-0.2.2
net-misc/sobby-0.2.0
net-libs/obby-0.2.1


The ones you listed are all incredibly new.

[Comment 2 Gustavo Felisberto (RETIRED) 2005-12-10 18:27:16 UTC]

I really mean the 0.3.0 as they were really well tested as rc's (that i removed
yesterday) and by a group of some 20 users with diferent setups (all gentoo of
course)

[Comment 3 Joshua Jackson (RETIRED) 2005-12-10 23:24:58 UTC]

gobby requires a >=gtkmm-2.6. As none are stable, need to have gnome herd take a
look and let us know what if any of the 2.6 gtkmm's are ready to be stable.
Attaching them as a cc

[Comment 4 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-12-26 01:39:08 UTC]

gnome-mm herd: ping

[Comment 5 Joshua Jackson (RETIRED) 2006-01-21 21:08:38 UTC]

stable on x86

[Comment 6 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-01-23 06:15:32 UTC]

gnome-mm is no longer needed to confirm, it got stable with gnome-2.12

all stable on amd64

x86: you forgot to mark net-misc/sobby-0.3.0 stable, readding you

[Comment 7 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-01-23 06:29:09 UTC]

Marked on x86... sorry about the confusion

[Comment 8 Henrique Rodrigues 2006-04-09 11:12:28 UTC]

Could this be marked stable for PPC also?

[Comment 9 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) 2006-07-01 03:12:55 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> Could this be marked stable for PPC also?
> 

These packages are in package.mask.  So I won't mark them stable.  Re-add ppc when the issues are resolved.

[Comment 10 Henrique Rodrigues 2006-07-01 03:34:56 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Could this be marked stable for PPC also?
> > 
> 
> These packages are in package.mask.  So I won't mark them stable.  Re-add ppc
> when the issues are resolved.

This bug regards net-libs/obby-0.3.0, net-libs/sobby-0.3.0, net-misc/sobby-0.3.0 and net-libs/net6-1.2.2, wich are not masked. Only versions 0.4.0_rc are.

[Comment 11 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) 2006-07-01 03:41:51 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> This bug regards net-libs/obby-0.3.0, net-libs/sobby-0.3.0,
> net-misc/sobby-0.3.0 and net-libs/net6-1.2.2, wich are not masked. Only
> versions 0.4.0_rc are.

Quoting from package.mask:

# Gustavo Felisberto <[e-mail]> (12 Mar 2006)
# Dirty fix that needs testing, see Changelog
=net-libs/obby-0.3.0-r1

[Comment 12 Wormo (RETIRED) 2006-07-24 23:40:56 UTC]

The ugly hack was in obby-0.3.0-r1 as opposed to obby-0.3.0, which is the version other arches stabled, so we should be ok to stable 0.3.0 too.

However I did encounter one problem testing sobby-0.3.0, which is that the init script won't allow it to start up with useflag -howl due to the "need mDNSResponder" line. Could that be changed to "before mDNSResponder"?

[Comment 13 Wormo (RETIRED) 2006-07-25 10:40:21 UTC]

Sorry, by "before" I meant "after"

[Comment 14 Matti Bickel (RETIRED) 2006-10-28 07:49:05 UTC]

=net-misc/sobby-0.3.0
=net-libs/obby-0.3.0-r1
=net-libs/net6-1.2.2
all got a shiny new ppc keyword. Enjoy :)