Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 113836 - xchat should have binary without version
Summary: xchat should have binary without version
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Packages in net-irc
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-28 12:44 UTC by Hanno Böck
Modified: 2006-12-25 07:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2005-11-28 12:44:43 UTC
current xchat still only installs xchat-2 binary. 
Either the binary should be renamed or it should install a symlink like the 
gimp ebuild does.
Comment 1 Sven Wegener gentoo-dev 2005-11-29 23:45:10 UTC
It's postfixed with -2 to be able to concurrently install xchat-1 and xchat-2
Comment 2 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-02-09 17:28:45 UTC
Until such time where xchat-1.X isn't in the tree, we still need this versioning.  Unless you have an alternative.
Comment 3 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2006-02-09 23:06:22 UTC
> Until such time where xchat-1.X isn't in the tree

I'd say just remove old cruft, but as I know this won't happen:

Cite myself above: "like the gimp ebuild"
From gimp ebuild:

inherit alternatives
[...]
alternatives_auto_makesym "/usr/bin/gimp" "/usr/bin/gimp-[0-9].[0-9]"
Comment 4 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-02-19 19:03:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's postfixed with -2 to be able to concurrently install xchat-1 and xchat-2
> 

Is there any reason to keep -1 in the tree?
Comment 5 Markus Ullmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-05 14:20:18 UTC
I'd say we can drop xchat-1...

Objections?
Comment 6 Markus Ullmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-19 16:33:37 UTC
Now that xchat-1 is gone and we're able to rename it, should we provide a symlink?
Comment 7 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2006-12-25 07:02:59 UTC
now fixed.