Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 113658 - [req] ebuild for TeXLive
Summary: [req] ebuild for TeXLive
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-26 13:23 UTC by ivo welch
Modified: 2007-02-07 16:24 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ivo welch 2005-11-26 13:23:27 UTC
The TeX Live distributions seem to be gaining steam, relative to tetex.  The
2005 version is going to be out any day now.  More information can be found at
http://tug.org/texlive/ .  (I stumbled onto TeX Live, because tetex has a 7
months old pdftex and pdfetex, which I was told was a little buggy.  I tried to
follow the recommended procedure to just upgrade pdftex by itself [binary and
pool file], but failed (at fmtutil --refresh).  I think the reason is that
gentoo moves some files around, relative to where tetex may usually install
them, but I could be wrong.)

TeXLive would be a nice alternative for gentoo relative to tetex, especially if
the texlive build is as "live" as it is claimed to be.  this would perhaps make
the ebuild creation easier.  (don't know how this magic works!)

one tex would probably block the other tex, but that can't be helped.

just a (self-interested) suggestion...


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Sebastian Schubert 2005-11-27 09:07:38 UTC
That would be very nice. Updating the teX system would be a lot easier because
texlive is released every year, tetex not as often.
Maybe, the (still beta) miktex package manager is an alternative for updating
non-system depending packages:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110494
Comment 2 ivo welch 2005-11-27 09:17:29 UTC
hmmm...I tried following the pdftex update instructions for getting a more
recent pdftex (pdfetex) to fly, but failed.  combination of what I believe to be
gentoo rearrangements of file locations, and too casual update installation
instructions for pdftex.

so, I fear a miktex updater would not help our tetex distribution.

:-(

/iaw
Comment 3 Sebastian Schubert 2005-11-27 10:08:26 UTC
mmmh, so Texlive would be the best choice. Nonetheless, the miktex updater
should be usefull for upgrading (aktually, adding it to local texmf tree)
non-critical packages like microtype, csquotes, lmodern, unitsdef, ...
Comment 4 Eric Thibodeau 2006-04-01 10:45:11 UTC
I actually tried using miktex with no success (it doesn't see the tree for some reason even after setting all sorts of variables and whatnot...) So, as per #latex, it would be nice to have an alternative bleeding edge Latex such as Tex Live.
Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-14 12:18:58 UTC
An ebuild is available, so I close this bug, though it is still hard masked.