The wellknown error is back in gentoo-sources, but it can easily be corrected: Line #405: #ifndef CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE Must be changed to: Line #405: #ifdef CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE And Line #672: #ifdef CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE Must be chanced to: Line #672: #ifndef CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE This may fix the error. (The error wasn't there in gentoo-sources r9, but they forgot to correct it in gentoo-sources r10.)
SORRY, MY FAULT!!! It the resulting lines must be like this instead: (switched them around, uups) Line #405: #ifndef CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE Line #672: #ifdef CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE
Bjarke, do you still see this problem in the latest lolo-sources, based on 2.4.20?
The problem doesn't exist in the newest vanilla-sources, but I can get the lolo-sources to compile.
Well, yesterday my poor P2 233 mhz router lost it's harddrive, so now I have a great chance to recreate it, and test the lolo sources on it. Just a question, does the new lolo-sources have the preempt patch in the kernel???
it certainly does, let me know how it goes on lolo-sources, thanks.
The newest lolo-sources runs perfectly on it, and since the stock kernel runs perfectly on my workstation, and the lolo-sources runs perfectly on my router, I'll change the bug to fixed, and hope this problem will newer show up again :)
and now it is changed to fixed (had to reopen it first)