Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 110375 - Add flag to sys-kernel/module-rebuild to only rebuild missing modules
Summary: Add flag to sys-kernel/module-rebuild to only rebuild missing modules
Status: RESOLVED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: John Mylchreest (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-24 14:04 UTC by Paul Varner (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-12-30 11:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Varner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-24 14:04:19 UTC
One of the flags that I had with kernelmod-rebuild was a -S, --smart-rebuild
flag which would only rebuild modules that were missing from /lib/modules.

I just saw this on the gentoo-user list and it jogged my memory that
module-rebuild had no such option.

> The Gentoo newsletter mentioned the new module-rebuild script,
> so I emerged it and ran it with the following results.
> 
> # module-rebuild list
> ** Packages which I will emerge are:
>         =media-libs/svgalib-1..21-r1
>         =net-wireless/ieee80211-1.0.3-r2
>         =net-wireless/ipw2100-1.1.2-r3
> 
> So I ran
> 
> # module-rebuild rebuild
> 
> and it seemed to rebuild the three packages in question.
> 
> As a check, I then ran module-rebuild list again, and it
> listed the same three modules as before.


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
N/A

Actual Results:  
N/A

Expected Results:  
N/A

pvarner@garath ~ $ emerge info
Portage 2.0.53_rc6 (default-linux/x86/2005.0, gcc-3.3.6, glibc-2.3.5-r2,
2.6.12-gentoo-r6 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0_pre9
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.13
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.20
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env
/usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/bind /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache cvs distlocks fixpackages sandbox sfperms
strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo
http://gentoo.mirrors.pair.com/"
LINGUAS="en"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acpi alsa apache2 arts artswrappersuid audiofile avi bash-completion
berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr crypt cups curl dvd eds emboss encode fam fbcon flac
foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imagemagick imlib java
javascript jpeg kde kdeenablefinal kdexdeltas libg++ libwww mad maildir mikmod
mmx motif mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl nsplugin ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pdflib
perl png ppds python qt quicktime readline samba sasl sdl spell sqlite sse ssl
tcltk tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev usb vorbis win32codecs
xine xml2 xmms xscreensaver xv zlib linguas_en userland_GNU kernel_linux
elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, MAKEOPTS
Comment 1 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-30 10:27:16 UTC
my problem here is that module-rebuild is actually doing the right thing, since even though s module might exist for the actual kernel version in question, the kernel image itself may have totally changed vermagic or a various collection of other situations.

It is imo always best to rebuild a module, whether the file exists or not. the only more accurate test would be to load the module, but this isn't an option since it introduces stability questions.

unfortunately, I cannot foresee this working. Any suggestions/code welcome.
Comment 2 Paul Varner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-30 11:08:58 UTC
I haven't had a chance to do code yet, but even if I did, it would have to be an off by default, you pick up the pieces if you have significantly changed your kernel type of thing.