Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 110317 - Please add ebuild for new unionfs-1.1.1
Summary: Please add ebuild for new unionfs-1.1.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Christian Andreetta (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-24 06:05 UTC by Radek Podgorny
Modified: 2006-02-13 05:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
nfs lock patch (unionfs-1.1.1-10-nfs.patch,944 bytes, patch)
2005-10-27 01:27 UTC, Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 		Details | Diff
unionfs 1.1.1 ebuild (patch vs 1.0.14) (unionfs-1.1.1.ebuild.patch,1014 bytes, patch)
2005-10-27 01:30 UTC, Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Radek Podgorny 2005-10-24 06:05:00 UTC 
The new release is linux-2.6 only and includes many important bugfixes...
Comment 1 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-24 07:49:23 UTC 
Can you please post the unified diff (diff -u old.ebuild new.ebuild)?
Comment 2 Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-27 00:40:54 UTC 
1.1.1 resolves most large directories issues, save nfs locking (patch will follow)
Comment 3 Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-27 01:27:07 UTC 
Created attachment 71549 [details, diff]
nfs lock patch
Comment 4 Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-27 01:30:24 UTC 
Created attachment 71550 [details, diff]
unionfs 1.1.1 ebuild (patch vs 1.0.14)
Comment 5 Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-27 01:31:01 UTC 
I couldn't test it on amd64. Anyone?
Comment 6 Darrel Clute 2005-11-06 03:37:07 UTC 
I can confirm that this patch works on AMD64 systems.
Comment 7 Darrel Clute 2005-11-06 22:19:57 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> I can confirm that this patch works on AMD64 systems.

Meant to state that the ebuild resulting from the patch works on AMD64 systems.
Comment 8 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-24 16:30:37 UTC 
I do not use unionfs currently. Satya, can you please bump it or should it be moved to maintainer-needed?
Comment 9 Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-25 02:16:11 UTC 
Ok, I'm taking it.
I haven't access to my dev box at now: travelling until the 3rd week of january, but maybe I'll be able to do something before (you'll still have to wait the beginning of january, though).
Comment 10 Eric Thibodeau 2006-01-27 15:27:09 UTC 
Well...jsut thought I'd say I simply renamed unionfs-1.0.14.ebuild to unionfs-1.1.2.ebuild, removed the epatch entries and everything built perfectly well. The module seems to be working fine for the moment as I am using it for a Gentoo SSI configuration http://wiki.neuralbs.com/index.php/Gentoo_Diskless_Client without any problems (arch is x86).
Comment 11 Christian Andreetta (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-13 05:44:10 UTC 
in portage: sorry for the delay.
Thanks to all testers!