Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 109640 - hardlink++ compiles on AMD64 and seems to work correctly
Summary: hardlink++ compiles on AMD64 and seems to work correctly
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: AMD64 Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-17 15:19 UTC by Amedee Van Gasse
Modified: 2005-10-22 04:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Amedee Van Gasse 2005-10-17 15:19:44 UTC
When keywording app-arch/hardlink++ in /etc/portage/package.use to ~x86, it can
be emerged without any error at all on amd64.
Preliminary testing of hardlink++ on an ext2 partition and a reiser partition
didn't reveal any obvious problems.
I suggest keywording the ebuild as ~amd64 to allow further testing.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. keyword app-arch/hardlink++ in /etc/portage/package.use as ~x86
2. emerge hardlink++
3. hardlink++ /directory1 /directory2

Actual Results:  
It just works!

Expected Results:  
It did what it was supposed to do.

Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2,
2.6.13-gentoo-r3 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.13-gentoo-r3 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r10
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.20
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env
/usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib64/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.math.bme.hu http://gentoo.ITDNet.net/gentoo
ftp://gentoo.itdnet.net/gentoo/ http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gentoo/
ftp://mirrors1.netvisao.pt/gentoo/"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
LINGUAS="nl"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X apache2 dvd flac gif gnome java jpeg kde logrotate mozilla mp3 mpeg
ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nvidia ogg oggvorbis opengl pam png ssl tiff truetype
vorbis xine xv linguas_nl userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL
Comment 1 UncleOwen 2005-10-19 06:40:44 UTC
dup of bug 109506
Comment 2 Amedee Van Gasse 2005-10-19 13:11:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)

I really don't understand how the duplicate occured! I didn't do it. Honest!
This must have been a browser bug (Firefox).
Comment 3 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-22 04:13:30 UTC
it is already ~amd64