Hi! Please find attached bayonne2-0.9.5.ebuild a second generation telephony application server.
Created attachment 70479 [details] bayonne2-0.9.5.ebuild (New Package)
This is just an initial contribution. bayonne build, but I did not tested. And some documentation is not deployed. I did upload, just in case someone want to test/update
Created attachment 70614 [details] bayonne2-0.9.5.ebuild (New Package) capi, openh323, and voice added
Created attachment 70684 [details] bayonne2-1.0.0.ebuild (New Package) Updated to bayonne2 1.0.0 Adding documentation
Created attachment 70691 [details] bayonne2-0.9.5.ebuild (New Package) Adding FAQ and THANKS to doc
Created attachment 70701 [details] bayonne2-1.0.0.ebuild (New Package) Adding SIP support. It builds. Still not tested if work.
Created attachment 70781 [details] bayonne2-1.0.0.ebuild (New Package) adding bayonne user/group creation :( I cannot do more then this. Need someone who know how to make bayonne test/work actually
Created attachment 94511 [details] bayonne2-1.5.26's ebuild This ebuild maybe not so perfect. It's modified from bayonne2-1.1.0 from voip-overlay on overlays.gentoo.org. I hope others could use it as a base to make a perfect version. I did 3 major modification: 1. I made a patch against the Makefile.in (this saved running automake, or maybe i should make it against Makefile.am). This patch could eliminate sandbox violation that would otherwise occur. 2. Change emake to make. As emake could use MAKEOPTS which you've set in make.conf. In my box I defined it as "-j2". If use emake, compile always fail. I suspect maybe "-j2" could be the cause. So I just use make, and it works. 3. add net-libs/libeXosip to RDEPEND, so that bayonne2 could build a sip driver. It's sad that bayonne2 don't provide a configuration option to enable or disable building sip driver .
Created attachment 94512 [details, diff] bayonne2-1.5.26-config-Makefile.in.patch The patch is against Makefile.in under config directory.
*** Bug 150528 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This looks pretty ancient, so I'm not sure if it's a good candidate to add to the tree.