Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 108379 - Potential new Infrastructure sponsor
Summary: Potential new Infrastructure sponsor
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Infrastructure
URL: http://www.mesh-solutions.com
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-07 06:26 UTC by Patrick Lauer
Modified: 2007-03-12 22:03 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Draft for a funding request with detailed HW information (funding-european-master-mirror.txt,4.32 KB, text/plain)
2005-12-11 08:04 UTC, Danny van Dyk (RETIRED)
Details
MESH Banners/Logo (Logo_MESH_koop_125_4b5.zip,41.20 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-09-12 07:45 UTC, Alexander Bien
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2005-10-07 06:26:10 UTC
Mesh Solutions is interested in offering connectivity and rackspace for Gentoo
use. This could be used, among other things, for a european master distfile server

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.
Comment 1 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2005-10-07 06:28:12 UTC
abien@nbmc.de is Alexander Bien, contact person for Mesh Solutions, rsync12.de
and ftp://ftp.gentoo.mesh-solutions.com/gentoo/ 
Comment 2 Corey Shields 2005-10-11 10:48:23 UTC
We don't currently have any spare hardware to send that way, but just for the
sake of info, how much bandwidth would be available at this site?

-C
Comment 3 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-11 11:55:39 UTC
We (as in: the German NFP "Friends of Gentoo e.V.") would be able to organize
sufficient hardware for a European master-mirror (a server machine, external
storage array).
Comment 4 Corey Shields 2005-10-11 12:07:57 UTC
Is the Friends of Gentoo e.V. willing to turn total control of said machine over
to the infrastructure team?  We keep systems such as this (a master distfiles
server) under tight access control.  

This brings up another point, such a server would need the utmost reliability. 
I don't have any personal experience with Mesh, and they look good on the data
center side, but network-wise as far as I can tell they are single-homed.  Can
you  find out if there are any other peers?  I am a firm believer that "beggars
can not be choosers" but we got bit last week when Level3 pulled their little
depeering stunt and one of our major providers is single-homed through them.

(disclaimer:  these statements are forward-thinking in nature acting on the
assumption that we want to deploy a euro distfiles master.  This may not be the
case)
Comment 5 Kurt Lieber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-11 12:34:59 UTC
we definitely want to deploy a Euro master mirror if we can find suitable
arrangements for it.  I agree with Corey that, ideally, we want to find a
multi-homed provider.  That said, even a single-homed provider would be better
than what we have now.

If we can find a suitable server that Infra can build and manage, I think this
sounds like a decent solution.
Comment 6 Alexander Bien 2005-10-11 12:57:45 UTC
MESH has lots and lots of peerings. ex with Cogent, Colt, and others. So in the
recent depeering with cogent most of the MESH customers didnt notice since we
have multiple private peerings with them. Check it out: http://tinyurl.com/ay4mp
(Link to RIPE)

We also have two feeds from L3 which are independantly going two our two C12K
GSR platforms and so forth.. Our uptime shouldnt be a problem.
Comment 7 Corey Shields 2005-10-11 13:15:37 UTC
Alexander, that's great!!  Like I said before we can't be picky since it's free
hosting, but last week was an eye opener.

Tobias, what do you have in mind?

-C
Comment 8 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-11 13:24:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is the Friends of Gentoo e.V. willing to turn total control of said machine over
> to the infrastructure team?  We keep systems such as this (a master distfiles
> server) under tight access control.  

In general yes. Especially when speaking about such a sensitive machine this
makes absolutely sense. Though it would be an additional option to bring new
infra members aboard (long-time & trusted Gentoo Developers) who live near the
datacenter and can also do needed hardware maintenance.
Comment 9 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-11 15:17:46 UTC
regarding hardware: there is some second-hand hardware available over here.

regarding maintenance: maybe we want to add someone living near the data center
to infra for maintenance, patrick also mentioned that we may have on-site support

so from my point of view we should work out what hardware we need and what we have
Comment 10 Alexander Bien 2005-10-13 02:27:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
(...)
> In general yes. Especially when speaking about such a sensitive machine this
> makes absolutely sense. Though it would be an additional option to bring new
> infra members aboard (long-time & trusted Gentoo Developers) who live near the
> datacenter and can also do needed hardware maintenance.

Incase physical access is a problem cause noone from Gentoo is living in the
area, we could work out a deal that will allow a certain ammount of monthly
remote hands via the local techs. 

(In reply to comment #2)
>We don't currently have any spare hardware to send that way, but just for the
>sake of info, how much bandwidth would be available at this site?

Since this is a public forum id just like to state "enough". If we can find a
more private place i would be happy to throw a number.
Comment 11 Daniel Nagy 2005-10-13 06:17:51 UTC
I'm workin at the NetMasters-Hungary Ltd. Our company is committed Gentoo user. 
In fact, all of our productive machine has Gentoo. Our company likes to offer 
some help, we can place the server in our Datacenter.
The company has two homes in Budapest, which has a private peer. These 
Datacenters are at Hungary's two biggest backbone providers, T-Online Hungary 
(Deutsche Telekomm subsidiary company) and GTS Central Europe. These centers has 
the following parameters:
T-Online Hungary
- Internal bandwidth 2x10Gbps to the Matav IP backbone network
- External bandwidth 1,8Gbps, which that dissolves through the Matav IP backbone 
network:
* 1Gbps to the Talia international backbone network
* 622Mbps to the Deutsche Telekom international backbone network
* 155Mbps to VIX (Vienna)

GTS Central Europe (this is the bigger)
- The bandwidth informations can be found on their homepage at: http://www.
gtsce.com/maps/index.html

Both of the companies has very good peering network:
T-Online Hungary: http://href.hu/x/mez
GTS Central Europe: http://href.hu/x/mew

Our company has many years of experience in hardwares, softwares (mainly Unix-
based systems of course), so we can offer hardware maintance too.
Comment 12 Alexander Bien 2005-10-19 07:59:57 UTC
These offerings do not seem to cause lots of excitement. I take it Gentoo infra
is all set with bandwidth/colo? :(
Comment 13 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-19 08:48:06 UTC
I'm really excited about getting a better europe presence and I think your
facilities will be execellent for what we need. Please don't take the lack of a
quick response as a form of non-interest. We all of real lives/jobs and it just
takes time for us to keep up with things like this.

The main things I'd to have is a 24x7 number to call in case of a problem and
someone that knows Gentoo well enough to fix a few things in case of problems.

About hardware, I would prefer not to use old second-hand hardware if possible.
I'd rather not have to put up something breaking without an warranty to cover
problems. Leaves less of a headache for us as well.
Comment 14 Alexander Bien 2005-10-19 14:57:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
(...)
> The main things I'd to have is a 24x7 number to call in case of a problem and
> someone that knows Gentoo well enough to fix a few things in case of problems.

We operate a 24/7 support number. We will have to work out what kind of response
times we would want commit to as we go along. But again, details would have to
be discussed in a more private environment.

Let me know if there is anything else i can explain :)

Comment 15 Corey Shields 2005-10-19 15:14:42 UTC
I think we're all game for the hosting you are offering, the holdup will be 
finding a box to host. 
 
Cheers! 
Comment 16 Daniel Nagy 2005-10-21 00:56:25 UTC
We also have 24/7 support number, and 3 of our administrators ready.
What hardware do we need for this server? How much storage...etc. Maybe we can 
offer hardware too.
Comment 17 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2005-10-26 05:10:34 UTC
I can take care of aquiring hardware, but I'd like to have some more info on
what is needed so that I don't deliver a lemon :-)
Comment 18 Corey Shields 2005-10-26 10:12:59 UTC
Being in Europe and such a critical infra service, I think OOB console is going
to be a must (ala iLO or DRAC..  iLO preferred).  Some IPMI hosts have it as
well but I have yet to see a remote console via IPMI work.

Cheers!
Comment 19 Wolfram Schlich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-18 03:08:50 UTC
A Peppercon eRIC would also be nice I think:
http://www.peppercon.com/remoteboards.html
Those have a very good reputation, especially in Germany.
Comment 20 Wolfram Schlich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-18 03:37:14 UTC
Would it be possible to build up a European master mirror "network" spread over
several locations instead of using a _single_ machine and location?
That could make it more acceptable to host at single homed locations.
Comment 21 Kurt Lieber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-18 06:07:25 UTC
A multi-homed network would be ideal (and it sounds like we already may have
one) but what we really need is hardware at this point.
Comment 22 Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-11 08:04:47 UTC
Created attachment 74504 [details]
Draft for a funding request with detailed HW information

Added a draft for the necessary funding request.

Contains 2 TODO items:
a) Fill in detailed conditions for hosting with Mesh Solutions. (patrick)
b) Ask further european NFPs (GeCHi) for participation. (plate)
Comment 23 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-25 06:42:48 UTC
Ping.

Been over a month, what's the status on this?
Comment 24 Alexander Bien 2006-02-03 08:00:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #23)
> Ping.
> 
> Been over a month, what's the status on this?
> 

Good question. Anyone?
As fas as MESH is concerned we are still offering. 
Comment 25 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2006-02-20 09:18:14 UTC
So ... this has been in hibernation for quite some time.
After some talks with Alexander and his boss it looks like Mesh is even offering to provide the hardware. I suggest that infra states any points of discussion left and we get this wrapped up soon.
Comment 26 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-04 04:51:55 UTC
In talking with Patrick this morning, I basically told him "show us (infra) the IP and the root password" and we can move from there. Infra can't do much without that. Hopefully we can get this moving if MESH is proposing to provide hardware, I am sure the european mirror admins would appreciate it.
Comment 27 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-18 21:51:15 UTC
Just an FYI update:

Much thanks to Mesh for getting us this box! I was able to get it built and rebooted on its own. I'm not currently trying to find time to sort out some organizational issues and then implement them. Needless to say, it has not been forgotten, just needing me and a few others to finish a few things up. 

Thanks again.
Comment 28 Alexander Bien 2006-09-12 07:45:41 UTC
Created attachment 96791 [details]
MESH Banners/Logo

Attached are 4 Versions of the Banner.
Comment 29 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-09 00:37:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #28)
> Attached are 4 Versions of the Banner.

Which still need to be placed, I guess.

Comment 30 Alexander Bien 2007-03-09 09:33:24 UTC
.. or not. The box was sitting idle for 5 Months, MESH then decided Gentoo isnt in need of sponsored hardware and/or colocation. In consultation with ramereth the box was disabled in October 2006. moooo :(

Bug could be closed i guess.
Comment 31 Lars Weiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-09 10:57:19 UTC
That's sad to hear.  But thanks for your efforts.
Comment 32 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-12 22:03:04 UTC
Sorry, wrong button...