Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 106343 - dev-java/mapdb - Concurrent Maps, Sets and Queues backed by disk storage or off-heap-memory. (was: =dev-java/jdbm-1.0 is available)
Summary: dev-java/mapdb - Concurrent Maps, Sets and Queues backed by disk storage or o...
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL: https://github.com/jankotek/mapdb
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-09-18 01:38 UTC by Gunnar Wrobel (RETIRED)
Modified: 2019-05-16 07:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
jdbm-1.0-buildfile.patch (jdbm-1.0-buildfile.patch,2.23 KB, text/plain)
2005-09-18 01:39 UTC, Gunnar Wrobel (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gunnar Wrobel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-18 01:38:25 UTC
The ebuild just needs a version bump to 1.0 and the patch for the build.xml
needs only minor modifications. I attached the modified patch.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Gunnar Wrobel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-18 01:39:08 UTC
Created attachment 68718 [details]
jdbm-1.0-buildfile.patch
Comment 2 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-25 22:25:43 UTC
Some unit tests fail here:
https://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/java/migrated-java-experimental-overlay/dev-java/jdbm
Comment 3 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-11-24 23:35:28 UTC
http://jdbm.sourceforge.net/
--> https://github.com/jankotek/JDBM3
--> https://github.com/jankotek/JDBM4
--> https://github.com/jankotek/mapdb

JDBM is quite old (reported in 2005, this bug last touched in 2007) and I doubt if it in still needed these days; therefore, we can bring MapDB (releases every month, last commit some days ago), which is its successor, to the Portage tree.

If someone still sees an use in the old JDBM and can fix it up, I suggest to file a new bug with fixed ebuilds and/or patches attached; see Comment #2 as to why it is broken. I however also suggest that we should look at removing JDBM from the Portage tree at some point after we have brought MapDB to the Portage tree.