Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 10325 - sys-apps/e2fsprogs-1.32 won't compile
Summary: sys-apps/e2fsprogs-1.32 won't compile
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: PPC Linux
: High critical (vote)
Assignee: Brandon Low (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-11-06 05:32 UTC by Lapo Calamandrei
Modified: 2006-02-04 06:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
emerge e2fsprogs output (log,8.53 KB, text/plain)
2002-11-12 03:50 UTC, Lapo Calamandrei
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lapo Calamandrei 2002-11-06 05:32:58 UTC
I get this error :

making all in lib/et
make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/e2fsprogs-1.30/work/e2fsprogs-1.30
/lib/et'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `compile_et', needed by `all'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/e2fsprogs-1.30/work/e2fsprogs-1.30/
lib/et'
make[1]: *** [all-libs-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/e2fsprogs-1.30/work/e2fsprogs-1.30'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 38, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)


emerge info output : 

Portage 2.0.43 (default-ppc-1.0, gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.2.5-r4,2.2.5-r7)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.19-r6 ppc 
USE="png ppc gnome-libs arts aalib guile scanner oss slang readline gpm berkdb
gdbm tcpd pam libwww ssl mitshm perl python esd gif imlib sdl oggvorbis gnome
gtk X qt kde motif mozilla truetype vte -alsa bonobo cdr crypth dga dvd evo
fbcon flash gb gphoto2 gtkhtml imap java jpeg mpeg nls opengl -pcmcia pdflib
quicktime wmf xml xml2 xv zlib doc spell"
ARCH="ppc"
COMPILER=""
CHOST="powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -mcpu=750 -mpowerpc-gfxopt -mmultiple -mstring"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -mcpu=750 -mpowerpc-gfxopt -mmultiple -mstring"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="ppc ~ppc"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/share/config
/usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
JDK_HOME="/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.3.1"
JAVA_HOME="/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.3.1"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
Comment 1 Mark Guertin 2002-11-07 13:18:56 UTC
It just compiled ok for my on 1.4_rc1 (gcc 3.2)

emerge info output:

Portage 2.0.43 (, gcc-3.2, glibc-2.2.5-r7)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.19-r6 ppc 0
USE="oss dvd xv gpm libwww jpeg nls mitshm gif png truetype ppc gnome-libs
gtkhtml gdbm berkdb slang readline arts bonobo java guile X sdl tcpd pam ssl
perl python esd imlib oggvorbis gnome gtk qt kde motif opengl mozilla"
ARCH="ppc"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CHOST="powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O3 -pipe -mcpu=7400 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -mpowerpc-gfxopt -fsigned-char"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -pipe -mcpu=7400 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -mpowerpc-gfxopt
-fsigned-char"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="ppc"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
JDK_HOME="/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.3.1"
JAVA_HOME="/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.3.1"
AUTOCLEAN="no"
SYNC=""
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
Comment 2 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-11 17:36:30 UTC
please test 1.32, if this persiste, re-open and rename bug.
Comment 3 Lapo Calamandrei 2002-11-12 03:50:51 UTC
Created attachment 5601 [details]
emerge e2fsprogs output
Comment 4 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-12 07:44:59 UTC
Can you tell me the output of 
emerge -s sed

AND

echo "This is a test"|sed -e "s:\(This[^t]*\)\(.*$\):\2\1:"

Looks like you have a broken sed somehow... need to figure out why.  
Comment 5 Lapo Calamandrei 2002-11-12 09:15:27 UTC
as requested :

lapo@nricx003 lapo $ emerge search sed
Searching...   
[ Results for search key : sed ]
[ Applications found : 2 ]
 
*  sys-apps/sed
      Latest version available: 4.0.1
      Latest version installed: 4.0.1
      Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/sed/sed.html
      Description: Super-useful stream editor
 
*  sys-apps/supersed
      Latest version available: 3.58-r2
      Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
      Homepage: http://queen.rett.polimi.it/~paolob/seders/ssed/
      Description: An enhanced version of sed which sports greater speed and the
use of perl regular expressions than GNU sed.
 
lapo@nricx003 lapo $ echo "This is a test"|sed -e
"s:\(This[^t]*\)\(.*$\):\2\1:"testThis is a 
Comment 6 Chris PeBenito (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-12 13:34:37 UTC
This is definately a sed problem.  It seems to be a sed 4.* problem. I tried
compiling e2fsprogs on my ppc, and it wont for the same reason.  I tried all of
the e2fsprogs versions in portage, and none compiled.  Once I stepped back to
sed 3.02.80-r4, e2fsprogs compiled.  So, it definately looks like sed 4 is
having some problems, at least on PPC.  Its kinda weird that only e2fsprogs
encounters this problem, tho.
Comment 7 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-12 16:46:50 UTC
who marked sed 4 for ppc anyway?
Comment 8 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-19 08:12:30 UTC
This officially confuses me.  I may have to put PPC back on old sed until this
is resolved.
Comment 9 Mark Guertin 2002-11-24 14:10:18 UTC
please emerge -u sed (back to 3.x).  I masked the sed 4.x stuff a while back 
due to this problem.  the sed 4.0 was derived from supersed, which had exact 
same problems on ppc which I've been unable to track down properly. sed 4.x 
was promoted to stable ppc imporperly when it was released :( 
Comment 10 Mark Guertin 2002-11-26 12:02:57 UTC
there were several other apps that had same sed problems, most notibly xmms ,
can't think of others off hand.

Seemant: not sure who upgraded sed 4 to stable

lapo: did this work for you?  would like to close this bug if possible
Comment 11 Lapo Calamandrei 2002-11-26 12:33:22 UTC
It compiles and *seems* to work fine with sed 3 series
Comment 12 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-11-26 13:32:51 UTC
I moved it to stable after talking to several PPCers who hadn't apparnetly
merged the particular apps which have problems with it...  Anywho... do the sed
people know about this, are they fixing it?
Comment 13 Mark Guertin 2002-11-28 16:12:43 UTC
lostlogic: I filed a bug a long time ago about it but never got much responsce
(when it was still ssed), I will try filing another one again
Comment 14 Mark Guertin 2002-12-05 09:33:42 UTC
closing this bug