compiling it results in... (after a while...) creating im-viqr.la (cd .libs && rm -f im-viqr.la && ln -s ../im-viqr.la im-viqr.la) ../../gtk/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 im-xim.la im-am-et.la im-cedilla.la im-cyrillic-translit.la im-inuktitut.la im-ipa.la im-thai-broken.la im-ti-er.la im-ti-et.la im-viqr.la > gtk.immodules /var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.8.0/work/gtk+-2.8.0/gtk/.libs/lt-gtk-query-immodules-2.0: error while loading shared libraries: libcairo.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [gtk.immodules] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.8.0/work/gtk+-2.8.0/modules/input' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.8.0/work/gtk+-2.8.0/modules'make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.8.0/work/gtk+-2.8.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 !!! ERROR: x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.0 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 92, Exitcode 2 !!! (no error message) !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. I tried making the following symlinks: ln -s libcairo.so.2.1.1 libcairo.so.1 ln -s libcairo.so.2.1.1 libcairo.so.1.0.0 so that... lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Aug 15 21:23 libcairo.so.1 -> libcairo.so.2.1.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Aug 15 21:23 libcairo.so.1.0.0 -> libcairo.so.2.1.1 Then I compiled again. It worked. W -- BTW, if this is not the correct action to have taken, please let me know so I can delete those symlinks! Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: # emerge info Portage 2.0.51.22-r2 (default-linux/amd64/2005.0, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r1, 2.6.12-gentoo-r8 x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.12-gentoo-r8 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13 distcc 2.18.3 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled] ccache version 2.3 [disabled] dev-lang/python: 2.3.5 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.5 sys-devel/binutils: 2.15.92.0.2-r10 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.18-r1 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=k8 -pipe -O2 -mtune=k8 -ftracer -fprefetch-loop-arrays -funroll-loops" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib64/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-march=k8 -pipe -O2 -mtune=k8 -ftracer -fprefetch-loop-arrays -funroll-loops" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict" GENTOO_MIRRORS="rsync://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/gentoo/ http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/gentoo/ ftp://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/gentoo" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="X a52 aac aim alsa amd64 avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cddb cdr crypt cups curl dvd dvdr eds encode esd faad fam ffmpeg flac foomatic foomaticdb fortran gif gimpprint gnome gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml hal imagemagick imlib ipv6 java jpeg junit libgda libsndfile libwww lzw lzw-tiff mad matroska mozilla mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nvidia offensive ogg oggvorbis openal opengl oscar oss pam pdflib perl png ppds python qt quicktime readline sdl spell ssl tcltk tcpd theora tiff tokenizer truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts usb userlocales vorbis wxwindows xine xinerama xml2 xpm xv xvid yahoo zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY
*** Bug 102691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Compiles have nothing to do with the release media... reassigning...
As you certainly already used pango-1.9.x snapshots, your installed pango did not need update thru portage. But it was linked against libcairo.so.1. As it is not rebuilt against libcairo.so.2 (as it is already seen up to date by portage), any -lpangocairo will look for libcairo.so.1. So rebuild pango against libcairo.so.2. Or let portage update pango to hardmasked pango-1.10.0. ;)
(In reply to comment #3) > As you certainly already used pango-1.9.x snapshots, your installed pango did > not need update thru portage. But it was linked against libcairo.so.1. As it > is not rebuilt against libcairo.so.2 (as it is already seen up to date by > portage),any -lpangocairo will look for libcairo.so.1. So rebuild pango > against libcairo.so.2. Yes, It's what I did... > Or let portage update pango to hardmasked pango-1.10.0. ;) It's what I did today. ;)
revdep-rebuild
You seem to have solved your own problem already. In the future just run revdep-rebuild if you errors like this, that's what it's for.
God, you people are stupid. You really think revdep-rebuild identifies all reverse dependencies. When I got rid of gdbm, some package, I've forgotten which one, broke. It was not linked to any libgdbm.so*, it had some internal conf that set gdbm as present (at the install) regardless of any USE flag. And it broke, because it could not recover from not finding /usr/bin/gdbm &c nor would it reconfigure without a fresh install/emerge. And it never showed up in revdep-rebuild, which I run often, or in `emerge -pvuD` or anything else. I am recompiling pango and cairo, and probably freetype, because I am getting a symbol not found error whilst compiling xfce-base/xfce-mcs-manager. It probably came about when the freetype package version advanced, downgraded, and then readvanced. And revdep-rebuild tells me everything is fine, which means revdep-rebuild is obviously of limited usefulness. So take your "Can't Happen Here/Our Shit Don't Stink" attitude and blow it out your collective arse before you turn into Debian.
And it's comments like that, that result in me not even bothering to look into your issue or helping you own. Now maybe I'd reconsider if you just got frustrated and just posted this.... But when you e-mail me your garbage as well... Not going to happen. None of us get paid for working on Gentoo. In fact it occationally cuts away from work time for me. We do this work and support on our own free time. Why should I have to take abuse from someone who's looking for my help? I don't have to.
