"Text snippet of concern" followed by quick fix or "quoted suggestion." "and other basic yet important aspects has" "and other basic, yet important aspects, has" "freely redistributable open-source" "freely redistributable, open-source" Added comma. Maybe a personal thing, but I think hyphenation can add clarity even if it is no necessarily proper (re-distributable and re-initialise, mentioned above COde Listing 2.2) "xorgcfg, which will first attempts" attempt (drop the 's') First a double hyphen ("-config -- typing") is used to denote a following comment, however later on ("disgracefully - something") only a single is used. Mentioned to add consistency. Depending how many hyphens are decided on, "strings - they" may need to be changed In Code Listing 4.1, perhaps alining the option parameters would aid in readability. "Just substitute the country-keycode with yours:" Perhaps offer a link to international codes "your mouse by checking the output" Sounds like the output /should/ be meaningful when, in fact, it is not. "If your mouse isn't detected, verify if all the necessary modules are loaded." Examples of modules to look for and how? "If your mouse is detected, fill in the device" How do you find out the device name? Depending how many hyphens are decided on, "used - most" may need to be changed In Code Listing 4.4, perhaps alining the option parameters would aid in readability. "syntaxis" looks as if it should be "syntaxes" (be sure to change both instances) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
(In reply to comment #0) > In Code Listing 4.1, perhaps alining the option parameters would aid in readability. Already are aligned, check your browser/fonts. > "your mouse by checking the output" Sounds like the output /should/ be > meaningful when, in fact, it is not. Fixed. > In Code Listing 4.4, perhaps alining the option parameters would aid in readability. Same as 4.1 > "syntaxis" looks as if it should be "syntaxes" (be sure to change both instances) Check the dictionary :) "The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48" Syntaxis Syn*tax"is, n. Syntax. R. --B. Jonson. 1913 Webster Rest of the stuff, fixed as needed and changes are in CVS. Thanks!
Odd, I found more instances of "syntaxes," but found plenty of both. Anyway, about the alignment in the code sections, I was a bit unclear or my fonts are scary bad. I intended to draw attention to, for example 'SubSection "Display"' and 'Depth 24'. The SubSection and Depth are fine, but Display and 24 are off by 2 spaces. Really, it's nothing big, just thought having all the values lined up might enhance readability. Thanks for reviewing this.
(In reply to comment #2) > "Display"' and 'Depth 24'. The SubSection and Depth are fine, but Display and > 24 are off by 2 spaces. Really, it's nothing big, just thought having all the > values lined up might enhance readability. Thanks for reviewing this. Nah, that's quite intentional and the indentation makes it more readable actually :)
Hehe. I'm honestly not trying to be annoying, but checking so I don't do this on other bugs :P This: Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Versus: Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard"
From my /etc/X11/xorg.conf, Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2" Option "Device" "/dev/psaux" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" So I guess the code listing is accurate.
