Bug 101655 – Ebuild xerces-c 2.4.0 fails

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 09:46:31 UTC]

Xerces-c 2.4.0-r1 fails to build

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge xerces-c
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
!!! ERROR: dev-libs/xerces-c-2.4.0-r1 failed.
(see attachment for full output)


USE="aac acl acpi aim apache2 audiofile bonobo bzip2 css dbus dvd dvdr \
     dvdread emul-linux-x86 exif faac fame ffmpeg gphoto2 hal hardened imap \
     jabber lm_sensors lzo maildir mime msn nptl oggvorbis oscar php posix \
     postfix reiserfs screen subp subtitles svg theora threads transcode \
     truetype unicode x11vnc xosd xvid -esd"

[Comment 1 Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 09:49:45 UTC]

Created attachment 65324 [details]
Error output from emerge

emerge =xerces-c-2.4.0-r1 2> xerces-c.err

[Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2005-08-07 09:52:30 UTC]

Please paste emerge info output. 
 

[Comment 3 Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 09:55:48 UTC]

See also Bug 101657 for a proposed patch of xerces-2.6.0

[Comment 4 Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 09:56:39 UTC]

Created attachment 65326 [details]
Standard output of emerge

[Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-08-07 10:03:55 UTC]

emerge --info output still missing...

[Comment 6 Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 10:16:49 UTC]

Created attachment 65330 [details]
emerge info

emerge --info

[Comment 7 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-08-07 14:38:27 UTC]

Is there a reason for keeping the 2.4.0 version around that I don't know of?  If
not, I'm going to remove it.

[Comment 8 Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 15:22:35 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Is there a reason for keeping the 2.4.0 version around that I don't know of?  If
> not, I'm going to remove it.

2.4.0 is marked as stable on amd64 (keyword amd64), whereas 2.6.0 is testing
(keyword ~amd64).

But I could eventually compile 2.6.0 on my amd64 based system (see Bug 101657).

[Comment 9 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-08-07 16:06:53 UTC]

xerces-2.6.0, not 2.6.0-r1, is stable on amd64.  The keywords are the same for
2.4.0-r1 and 2.6.0.

[Comment 10 Régis Décamps 2005-08-07 16:40:25 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> xerces-2.6.0, not 2.6.0-r1, is stable on amd64.  The keywords are the same for
> 2.4.0-r1 and 2.6.0.

I don't have the same KEYWORDS for 2.4.0-r1 and 2.6.0-r1

dev-libs/xerces-c-2.4.0-r1.ebuild ($Header:
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-libs/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.4.0-r1.ebuild,v 1.6
2004/07/02 04:57:24 eradicator Exp $) is marked stable
KEYWORDS="x86 ~ppc amd64 ~sparc"

On the contrary, dev-libs/xerces-c-2.6.0-r1 ($Header:
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-libs/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.6.0-r1.ebuild,v 1.2
2005/07/14 00:00:46 halcy0n Exp $) and is marked testing
KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc ~sparc ~amd64"

I thought this why the resaon why there are both versions 2.4.0 and 2.6.0.(in
reply to your Comment 7)

[Comment 11 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-08-07 17:51:38 UTC]

Removed xerces-2.4.0-r1 from the tree.  Its not depended on by anything.  Also,
I said 2.4.0-r1 and 2.6.0 had the same keywords, not 2.4.0-r1 and 2.6.0-r1.