Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 101503 - Hosting request for Project Gentopia
Summary: Hosting request for Project Gentopia
Status: RESOLVED LATER
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Infrastructure
URL: http://www.cardoe.com/archives/2005/0...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-05 19:48 UTC by Doug Goldstein (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-10-26 10:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-05 19:48:40 UTC
This is the Gentopia hosting metabug so to speak. I promise to flesh it out and
answer any and all questions here. The basic request is that we get some SVN
space as well as trac connected to SVN.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-11 11:26:41 UTC
At the point where I'm willing to send infra a box to get this setup. I'd write
a GLEP up at that point. Because then I'd suggest "projects.gentoo.org" which
could host all non-Portage tree projects and provide them with a nice Trac+SVN
interface. 

Gentopia could go on there. Ecelctic (I can never spell it) could go on there.
Keychain could go on there. Even baselayout if they wanted and whatever other
projects that are geared for Gentoo.

I'd be willing to handle all the admining of that box and configuration.
Wouldn't increase any of your workload. Obviously you guys would have all the
access in the world on it because you'd want to triple check security, which I
totally understand. But I'd be willing to handle the rest.
Comment 2 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-11 17:33:24 UTC
Well, the major hurdle we'd have to solve is making this work without putting
this on lark. Did you have ideas on that? Also, some of our devs (particularly
solar) is hesitant on using any sort of webdav app for security issues. He'd
need to comment on the specifics behind that, but I generally trust his
judgement on things like that. Is this just going to be a read-only type setup?
Otherwise we could make it work similar to the nodes. Also, wouldn't part of
this be duplicated if we include svn on our viewcvs eventually? I guess I'm a
little confused what this project is about and the goals behind it. Can you
please be a little more detailed?
Comment 3 Corey Shields 2005-08-12 21:55:59 UTC
AFAIK, trac is just svn+wiki+bugs..  We have svn, we have a developer wiki 
(purposely no public wiki because the docs team does a good enough job as it is 
with our web docs), and we have bugs. 
 
The next step would be to propose to the managers that this become an official 
Gentoo project. 
 
-C 
Comment 4 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-12 22:33:26 UTC
Details about what Gentopia is... It's long... I'll copy and paste it here if
you really want.

http://www.cardoe.com/archives/2005/08/13/what-is-gentopia/
Comment 5 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-12 23:47:45 UTC
The official request to bring this up to the managers but really the council,
once they're elected. Grant you're really the only one I know to bring this to
so I'm CCing you.
Comment 6 Kurt Lieber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-14 12:02:30 UTC
to be clear, what corey is saying in his comment is that we already provide the
services that you're requesting, so this bug is simply to create an SVN
repository without trac support.

If you're asking for a separate issue tracking system as well as a separate wiki
system, just for this project, then I'm not sure that's something we're willing
to provide or support.
Comment 7 Corey Shields 2005-08-14 16:02:33 UTC
Kurt is right on..   I talked with Doug on IRC the other day and explained this
to him.  Personally I'm excited at the prospect of Project Gentopia.  However,
before we can give it space on the official infrastructure, a couple of things
have to be done:

1 - Managers need to agree to adopt it as an official project (which, with the
new tribal council or whatever, probably needs to go to them)

2 - Whoever has been involved thus far, if it is heavy code-wise, will need to
be willing to sign joint-copyright with the Foundation on the code.  This will
come in the near future, but since this project will likely be adopted before
then I'm throwing it out as an FYI.

Cheers,

-C 
Comment 8 Grant Goodyear (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-16 17:17:06 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> 1 - Managers need to agree to adopt it as an official project (which, with the
> new tribal council or whatever, probably needs to go to them)

Actually, this one isn't correct, since part of the new metastructure is that
devs can create new projects at will.  I'm sure that we're eventually going to
need a way to thin out the dead ones eventually, but for now creating the
project makes it as "official" as any other (albeit not necessarily supported).
As for providing more than a project page, though, that's up to the infra folks.
Comment 9 Corey Shields 2005-09-30 23:00:07 UTC
Given Grant's corrections..  Doug, do you still want an svn repo?  
  
-C  
Comment 10 Corey Shields 2005-10-26 10:14:12 UTC
Doug is taking a leave for a while and I haven't heard anything since my last
ping, so I am going to close this bug for now.  Feel free to reopen later.