Bug 101324 – unionfs: new version 1.0.13

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:30:13 UTC]

Version bump. Included is a patch to fix a compile bug in xattr.c

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

[Comment 1 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:32:27 UTC]

Created attachment 65063 [details]
ebuild

[Comment 2 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:32:59 UTC]

Created attachment 65064 [details]
unionfs-1.0.13.ebuild

[Comment 3 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:33:48 UTC]

Created attachment 65065 [details, diff]
patch to make unionfs compile on amd64

[Comment 4 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:34:13 UTC]

Created attachment 65066 [details, diff]
patch to make xattr.c compile

[Comment 5 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) 2005-08-04 12:48:56 UTC]

Can you please attach only unified diffs (diff -u oldfile newfile) with your
changes?

[Comment 6 Zac Medico 2005-08-05 16:43:52 UTC]

dosbin snapmerge
dodoc patch-kernel.sh

[Comment 7 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-07 06:28:25 UTC]

Created attachment 65307 [details]
unionfs-1.0.13.ebuild

As requested, added the /sbin/snapmerge and .../doc/patch-kernel.sh to the
ebuild.

[Comment 8 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-07 06:30:50 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)
> Can you please attach only unified diffs (diff -u oldfile newfile) with your
> changes?

Sorry, I don't understand that request. The patches to the .c files are unified
diffs (which have to be applied seperately).

Do you want me to provide the ebuild as an diff, too?

Regards,
Hakan

[Comment 9 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) 2005-08-07 07:49:41 UTC]

Yes, please attach unified diffs agianst the ebuild in portage instead of full
ebuilds.

[Comment 10 Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-07 08:09:01 UTC]

Created attachment 65315 [details, diff]
diff against the 1.12a ebuild

[Comment 11 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) 2005-08-11 02:01:01 UTC]

Oh, and please don't attach patches that you have not changed (amd64 patch)
It is now in cvs, thank you all.