Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 100571 - subversion 1.2.1 ebuild required with apache stable (apache-2.0.54-r8)
Summary: subversion 1.2.1 ebuild required with apache stable (apache-2.0.54-r8)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-28 03:19 UTC by olivierva
Modified: 2005-10-06 19:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild for subversion-1.2.1 works with apache-2.0.54-r8 (subversion-1.2.1-r1.ebuild,10.94 KB, text/plain)
2005-07-28 04:26 UTC, Takahiro Yoshimura
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description olivierva 2005-07-28 03:19:36 UTC
I'm running Subversion 1.2.1 (which currently needs apache-2.0.54-r12) but I
also want to run mod_php 4.4.0. Which is blocked if you run > apache-2.0.54-r10.
(I need mod_php 4.4.0 because mediawiki 1.4 is incompatible with php5 and
mediawiki 1.5 which does support php5 is not stable yet). 
Anyway, a subversion ebuild which works with apache-2.0.54-r8 would solve this
dependency mess :-)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-28 03:35:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm running Subversion 1.2.1 (which currently needs apache-2.0.54-r12) but I
> also want to run mod_php 4.4.0. Which is blocked if you run > apache-2.0.54-r10.

mod_php-4.4.0-r1 is for that version of Apache, put it into
/etc/portage/package.keywords.
Comment 2 olivierva 2005-07-28 04:11:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)

Ah, had not seen the 4.4.0_r1 yet!

Thanks

Comment 3 Takahiro Yoshimura 2005-07-28 04:26:26 UTC
Created attachment 64517 [details]
ebuild for subversion-1.2.1 works with apache-2.0.54-r8

Sorry for chiming in, but I also have a need for subversion 1.2.x which runs on
that stable apache2 (I run some production servers, and need to provide that
service.)

And I've created an ebuild for 1.2.1.
Would you mind if you re-open the bug and take a look of them?
Comment 4 olivierva 2005-07-28 04:44:47 UTC
I think an ebuild for subversion 1.2.1 for a STABLE apache is a good idea
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-28 05:02:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think an ebuild for subversion 1.2.1 for a STABLE apache is a good idea

Uhm, subversion-1.1.3 works with stable apache. Moreover, the plan is to get rid
of dual apache layouts as soon as possible.
Comment 6 olivierva 2005-07-28 05:13:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
My current repository (running svn 1.2.1) is filled with active projects and I
prefer (don't know if it's even possible) to downgrade it to 1.1.3.


> (In reply to comment #4)
> > I think an ebuild for subversion 1.2.1 for a STABLE apache is a good idea
> 
> Uhm, subversion-1.1.3 works with stable apache. Moreover, the plan is to get rid
> of dual apache layouts as soon as possible.

Comment 7 Takahiro Yoshimura 2005-07-28 05:47:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Uhm, subversion-1.1.3 works with stable apache. Moreover, the plan is to get rid
> of dual apache layouts as soon as possible.

Yes, I know you're working really, REALLY hard to improve the whole distro for free.

But the lack of file locking of 1.1.3 is preventing our devs from doing any
serious work on binary files (here at Monolith Works Co.)

Thanks in advance.
Comment 8 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-25 06:17:00 UTC
There should be a new release (1.2.3) out soon. For that one I'll create two
versions, one with the new apache support, and one without.
Comment 9 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-27 13:26:48 UTC
Please try the (masked) 1.2.3 version I just committed, and report on whether it
works. I don't have an environment with a stable apache at hand, so I didn't
test it.
Comment 10 Andre Hinrichs 2005-09-19 01:40:06 UTC
After doing a sync yesterday (which was very big...) the now stable svn 1.2.3
is blocking apache >=2.0.54-r30
But Portage wants to upgrade apache as it is stable now...

Marking subversion-1.2.3-r1 stable would solve this.
Comment 11 Andre Hinrichs 2005-09-19 06:52:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> Marking subversion-1.2.3-r1 stable would solve this.

It's fixed! Thanks.
Comment 12 Paul de Vrieze (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-19 12:50:46 UTC
Yeah, I knew apache would get stable yesterday, but I had guests yesterday to
celebrate the middle autumn festival. But as you said svn is stable on x86 now.
Comment 13 Takahiro Yoshimura 2005-10-06 19:33:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> Please try the (masked) 1.2.3 version I just committed, and report on whether it
> works. I don't have an environment with a stable apache at hand, so I didn't
> test it.

(Ugh.  I'm sorry for not watching here for a while.)

Thanks, it works with apache-2.0.54-r8.
Anyways things changed quite a lot... now the new apache layout is stable.

Keep up good work!