Bugzilla Bug 99992

Please consider adding onaccess use for clamav.
This depends on dazuko (bug #11487), but will allow users to figure out that
they need this component as dependency.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Created an attachment (id=64110) [details]
clamav-0.86.1-r1.ebuild.diff

Suggested modifications for clamav ebuild.

Now, after there is sys-fs/dazuko, can you please consider the attached
modification in order to add onaccess use?

We'll need dazuko keyworded atleast ~arch for all supported arches, or atleast
for arches which dazuko actually works on.

CCing dazuko maintainer: Wolfram, is there some list of arches dazuko will/will
not work on, to narrow the list? Otherwise onaccess support for clamav will have
to wait until dazuko receives attention from all relevant arch teams.

Created an attachment (id=79468) [details]
clamav-0.88.ebuild.diff

Updated ebuild, sets udev permissions for dazuko.

Created an attachment (id=79469) [details]
udev-60-dazuko.rules

udev rule for dazuko.

Hello,
If you don't wish to do this, please close the bug.

I was waiting for Wolfram, but looks like we'll have to do it via USE-flag
masking for other architectures.

(In reply to comment #7)
> I was waiting for Wolfram, but looks like we'll have to do it via USE-flag
> masking for other architectures.

Hello,
A lot of time passed.
Can you please do this via USE-flag masking?

OK, I got clamuko working easily, but it requires /dev/dazuko to be writable by
user that runs clamav. How do we handle this in dazuko and/or clamav ebuilds?

Created an attachment (id=104303) [details]
clamav-0.88.7.ebuild.diff

Created an attachment (id=104304) [details]
udev-60-dazuko.rules

(In reply to comment #9)
> OK, I got clamuko working easily, but it requires /dev/dazuko to be writable by
> user that runs clamav. How do we handle this in dazuko and/or clamav ebuilds?

Attachmens are modified ebuild and udev rule (put in ${FILESDIR}).
The udev rule allows clamav to access the device.
It is installed if you use the onaccess use flag.

Um, is it OK if we just echo the line to /etc/udev/rules.d/60-dazuko.rules
instead of adding yet another file in the tree?

Newly added clamav-0.88.7-r1 has support for dazuko now. At last.

Thanks for your time spent on this, Alon.

Thanks!
Any reason to remove the postinst messages?

Hi!
I see you removed the fbsd keyword because of dazuko...
You could have simply mask the onaccess use flag from fbsd...

(In reply to comment #16)
> Hi!
> I see you removed the fbsd keyword because of dazuko...
> You could have simply mask the onaccess use flag from fbsd...
> 

Yes, I plan to ping fbsd team for that, but I didn't get around to do it yet.