Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 99714 - METABUG upgade for bugzilla 2.20
Summary: METABUG upgade for bugzilla 2.20
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Bugzilla (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 114004 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 99394 99437
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-07-20 12:10 UTC by Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED)
Modified: 2011-10-30 23:14 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
X-Bugzilla- email headers (xbugzilla-headers.patch,1016 bytes, patch)
2005-10-30 16:10 UTC, Mark Loeser (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 12:10:01 UTC
add in the "Arch Tester" distinction on comments.
Comment 1 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-30 17:32:55 UTC
HTML bit for "Add arches" button:

<input type="button" value="Add Arches" onClick="document.changeform.newcc.value
= 'comma separated list of arch emails'">
Comment 2 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-13 15:27:08 UTC
Jeffrey - thanks for all your effort here.      
bugs:     
Status Whiteboard seems to have dropped.     
     
Secure links in email dropped: "Clear-Text: http://.... Secure: https://bug.."     
     
The font on bug title is a bit small (ouch I'm sounding petty)     
http://bugstest.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92527     
Bugzilla Bug 92527 the book was to hard to read. << this bit at the top     
     
"This is Bugzilla" in header - oh duh! - suggest omit 
 
Are KEYWORDS and STATUS Whiteboard ment to be in the email headers? Would be    
handy for highlighting security bugs. Ok this is almost sounding like a    
feature request - hand me that drill - ref bugtest  92527   
   
We get insightful messages now? neat!  
http://bugstest.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=forensics   
Thu Oct 13 2005 15:16:53 PDT   
All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.   
Windows is NOT the answer. Windows is the question. The answer is NO!   
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a bannana. <- spelling error   
(nitpicking award to Daniel :-) -> banana   
---| scratch here for the quip |---   
 
Comment 3 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-13 19:32:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Jeffrey - thanks for all your effort here.      
> bugs:     
> Status Whiteboard seems to have dropped.     
>      
> Secure links in email dropped: "Clear-Text: http://.... Secure: https://bug.."
    
>    

added
  
> The font on bug title is a bit small (ouch I'm sounding petty)     
> http://bugstest.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92527     
> Bugzilla Bug 92527 the book was to hard to read. << this bit at the top     

thats just a matter of the CSS. i will be comparing this to our current setup.
      
> Are KEYWORDS and STATUS Whiteboard ment to be in the email headers? Would be    
> handy for highlighting security bugs. Ok this is almost sounding like a    
> feature request - hand me that drill - ref bugtest  92527   

the default headers in the new bugzilla install are:
X-Bugzilla-Reason: %reasonsheader%
X-Bugzilla-Product: %product%
X-Bugzilla-Component: %component%

I pray i dont have to add more

>    
> We get insightful messages now? neat!  
> http://bugstest.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=forensics   
> Thu Oct 13 2005 15:16:53 PDT   
> All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.   
> Windows is NOT the answer. Windows is the question. The answer is NO!   
> Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a bannana. <- spelling error   
> (nitpicking award to Daniel :-) -> banana   

Those are quips. I've turned them off globally. $diety knows we dont need users
going haywire over them.  

Comment 4 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-13 20:38:26 UTC
andrew,

any ideas why this wont work?

        <tr><td align="right"><form method=post
onSubmit="document.changeform.newcc.value">
        <select name="addarchs" multiple size="5">
                <option value="amd64@gentoo.org,">AMD64
                <option value="arm@gentoo.org,">ARM
                <option value="hppa@gentoo.org,">HPPA
                <option value="ia64@gentoo.org,">IA64
        </select>
        <input type=submit value="Add Archs">
        </form></td></tr>
Comment 5 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-14 05:15:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> andrew,
> 
> any ideas why this wont work?
> 
>         <tr><td align="right"><form method=post
> onSubmit="document.changeform.newcc.value">
>         <select name="addarchs" multiple size="5">
>                 <option value="amd64@gentoo.org,">AMD64
>                 <option value="arm@gentoo.org,">ARM
>                 <option value="hppa@gentoo.org,">HPPA
>                 <option value="ia64@gentoo.org,">IA64
>         </select>
>         <input type=submit value="Add Archs">
>         </form></td></tr>

You're going about it the wrong way. Try this:

        <tr><td align="right"><form name="arches" onSubmit="return false">
        <select name="addarches" multiple size="5">
                <option value="amd64@gentoo.org">AMD64
                <option value="arm@gentoo.org">ARM
                <option value="hppa@gentoo.org">HPPA
                <option value="ia64@gentoo.org">IA64
        </select>
        <input type="button" value="Add Archs" onclick="add_arches()">
        </form></td></tr>
<script>
function add_arches() {
  var i;
  for(i=0;i<document.arches.addarches.options.length;i++) {
    if(document.arches.addarches.options[i].selected) {
      if(!document.changeform.newcc.value) {
        document.changeform.newcc.value =
document.arches.addarches.options[i].value;
      } else {
        document.changeform.newcc.value = document.changeform.newcc.value + ","
+ document.arches.addarches.options[i].value;
      }
      // Deselect the item...not necessary
      document.arches.addarches.options[i].selected = false;
    }
  }
}
</script>

Comment 6 petre rodan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-15 12:40:00 UTC
http://bugstest.gentoo.org/token.cgi?a=reqpw&loginname=kaiowas%40gentoo.org
(aka password forgot form) doesn't like me
i did not receive a mail with the new password
Comment 7 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-16 13:44:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> http://bugstest.gentoo.org/token.cgi?a=reqpw&loginname=kaiowas%40gentoo.org
> (aka password forgot form) doesn't like me
> i did not receive a mail with the new password

i turned off email to test something, and forgot to turn it on. turning back on.
Comment 8 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-30 16:10:09 UTC
Created attachment 71767 [details, diff]
X-Bugzilla- email headers

Any chance of getting my X-Bugzilla email headers added?  Its 4 lines that need
to be added and has been accepted upstream for the next version.  It currently
adds Keywords and Severity to the email headers. I don't have the whiteboard
added because I haven't thought of a sane way to add it for upstream yet.
Comment 9 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-30 17:45:18 UTC
The alternating light grey, white lines for results seems to not be working
quite right.  For example, compare this query http://tinyurl.com/8c9pr with a
similar one on live bugzilla.
Comment 10 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-31 04:29:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=71767) [edit]
> X-Bugzilla- email headers
> 
> Any chance of getting my X-Bugzilla email headers added?  Its 4 lines that need
> to be added and has been accepted upstream for the next version.  It currently
> adds Keywords and Severity to the email headers. I don't have the whiteboard
> added because I haven't thought of a sane way to add it for upstream yet.

Patch added. Please assign yourself a bug in bugstest and try this out to make
sure its working. Get back to me either on irc or here to confirm so.
Comment 11 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-31 04:51:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> The alternating light grey, white lines for results seems to not be working
> quite right.  For example, compare this query http://tinyurl.com/8c9pr with a
> similar one on live bugzilla.

This fix is brought to you by the delete key and the words "background-color:
white." Done and fixed.
Comment 12 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-31 08:16:34 UTC
Looks like it's missing the DUPLICATE Resolution.  For example:

http://bugstest.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15142

Note that resolution is empty by you can see it marked in the bug activity.
Comment 13 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-31 15:09:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> Looks like it's missing the DUPLICATE Resolution.  For example:
> 
> http://bugstest.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15142
> 
> Note that resolution is empty by you can see it marked in the bug activity.

This was something fixed in the newer bugs database. Since the one bugstest is
pointing at is severly old, its still showing up like that.
Comment 14 Georgi Georgiev 2005-11-16 15:15:51 UTC
I can see posters' e-mail addresses without logging in.
Comment 15 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-17 03:52:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #14)
> I can see posters' e-mail addresses without logging in.

That is a pretty invasive patch that takes some time getting into place. Once I
do the upgrade, I am going to do that in a test installation and create an
entire patch to submit to the bugzilla upstream for submission. But at this
time, I am not going to implement it.
Comment 16 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-30 03:49:27 UTC
*** Bug 114004 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-16 15:40:07 UTC
bouncing this to bug 115796

-jeffrey
Comment 18 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-05 12:50:32 UTC
I want more headers, please... =]
Comment 19 Curtis Napier (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-18 17:14:12 UTC
Reopening.

Can we get the old behaviour of hiding email addresses for anonymous users turned back on? We receieved a complaint on www@g.o

Thanks Jeff.

--curtis
Comment 20 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-19 18:18:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #19)
> Reopening.
> 
> Can we get the old behaviour of hiding email addresses for anonymous users
> turned back on? We receieved a complaint on www@g.o
> 
That is an enormous hack, and something I hear is being coded into an upcoming release.

Comment 21 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-22 14:38:47 UTC
Let's close this for now.